Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Classical Gravitational Bremsstrahlung from a Worldline Quantum Field Theory
2021143 citationsGustav Uhre Jakobsen, Gustav Mogull et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
Gravitational Bremsstrahlung and Hidden Supersymmetry of Spinning Bodies
2022106 citationsGustav Uhre Jakobsen, Gustav Mogull et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and First Self-Force Order
202458 citationsGustav Uhre Jakobsen, Gustav Mogull et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
Emergence of Calabi–Yau manifolds in high-precision black-hole scattering
202527 citationsGustav Uhre Jakobsen, Albrecht Klemm et al.Natureprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Plefka's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Plefka with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Plefka more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Plefka. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Plefka. The network helps show where Jan Plefka may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan Plefka
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan Plefka.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan Plefka based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jan Plefka. Jan Plefka is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jakobsen, Gustav Uhre, Albrecht Klemm, Gustav Mogull, et al.. (2025). Emergence of Calabi–Yau manifolds in high-precision black-hole scattering. Nature. 641(8063). 603–607.27 indexed citations breakdown →
Jakobsen, Gustav Uhre, et al.. (2024). Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and First Self-Force Order. Physical Review Letters. 132(24). 241402–241402.58 indexed citations breakdown →
Jakobsen, Gustav Uhre, Gustav Mogull, Jan Plefka, & Jan Steinhoff. (2021). Classical Gravitational Bremsstrahlung from a Worldline Quantum Field Theory. Physical Review Letters. 126(20). 201103–201103.143 indexed citations breakdown →
Loebbert, Florian, et al.. (2020). Three-Body Effective Potential in General Relativity at 2PM and Resulting PN Contributions. arXiv (Cornell University).2 indexed citations
Beisert, Niklas, Dennis Müller, Jan Plefka, & Cristian Vergu. (2015). Smooth Wilson loops in N=4 non-chiral superspace. Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich).8 indexed citations
Fischbacher, Thomas, Thomas Klose, & Jan Plefka. (2005). Planar plane-wave matrix theory at the four loop order. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2005(2).2 indexed citations
17.
Nicolai, Hermann, et al.. (2002). An Introduction to the Quantum Supermembrane. Gravitation and Cosmology. 8. 1.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.