Citations per year, relative to Jan De Vos Jan De Vos (= 1×)
peers
Michal Pagis
Countries citing papers authored by Jan De Vos
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jan De Vos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan De Vos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan De Vos more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan De Vos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan De Vos. The network helps show where Jan De Vos may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan De Vos
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan De Vos.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan De Vos based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jan De Vos. Jan De Vos is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Vos, Jan De. (2017). No hay futuro sin crítica de la psicología: una interrogación del marxismo al psicoanálisis. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University). 9(9). 16–35.
4.
Vos, Jan De. (2016). Hauntology or the Return of the Real Man: Edging the Žižek-Laclau controversy on populism. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University). 4(3). 1–21.1 indexed citations
5.
Vos, Jan De. (2016). From Panopticon to Pan-psychologisation or, Why do so many women study psychology?. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University). 2(1).
Vos, Jan De, et al.. (2015). Neuroscience and critique: exploring the limits of the neurological turn. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 173–187.18 indexed citations
Vos, Jan De. (2013). Interpassivity and the Political Invention of the Brain: Connolly's Neuropolitics versus Libet's Veto-right. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University). 16(2).6 indexed citations
10.
Vos, Jan De. (2013). The universality of the virtual absence of critical psychology in Flanders: some personal remarks. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).1 indexed citations
Vos, Jan De. (2010). Beyond psychologisation: the non-psychology of the Flemish novelist Louis Paul Boon. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).1 indexed citations
Vos, Jan De. (2009). The Academy of Everyday Life—Psychology, hauntology, and psychoanalysis. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 13(4). 1–17.7 indexed citations
15.
Vos, Jan De. (2008). From Panopticon to Pan-psychologisation. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).12 indexed citations
16.
Vos, Jan De. (2005). On psychology and other symptoms. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University). 3(2). 258–270.2 indexed citations
17.
Vos, Jan De. (2002). Una tierra para sembrar sueños : historia reciente de la Selva Lacandona. Fondo de Cultura Económica eBooks.16 indexed citations
18.
Vos, Jan De. (1997). Vivir en frontera : la experiencia de los indios de Chiapas.23 indexed citations
19.
Vos, Jan De. (1993). Las fronteras de la frontera sur. 5(26). 4–8.9 indexed citations
20.
Vos, Jan De. (1988). Viajes al desierto de la soledad : cuando la Selva Lacandona aún era selva.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.