Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Clinical Features and Prognostic Factors in Adults with Bacterial Meningitis
20041.0k citationsDiederik van de Beek, Jan de Gans et al.New England Journal of Medicineprofile →
Dexamethasone in Adults with Bacterial Meningitis
2002711 citationsJan de Gans, Diederik van de BeekNew England Journal of Medicineprofile →
Community-Acquired Bacterial Meningitis in Adults
2006529 citationsDiederik van de Beek, Jan de Gans et al.New England Journal of Medicineprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Jan de Gans's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan de Gans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan de Gans more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan de Gans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan de Gans. The network helps show where Jan de Gans may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan de Gans
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan de Gans.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan de Gans based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jan de Gans. Jan de Gans is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hoogman, Martine, Diederik van de Beek, Martijn Weisfelt, Jan de Gans, & Ben Schmand. (2007). Cognitive outcome in adults after bacterial meningitis. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 78(10). 1092–1096.142 indexed citations
Beek, Diederik van de & Jan de Gans. (2005). Prognostic factors in adults with bacterial meningitis - Reply. New England Journal of Medicine. 352(5).2 indexed citations
Beek, Diederik van de, Jan de Gans, Lodewijk Spanjaard, et al.. (2004). Clinical Features and Prognostic Factors in Adults with Bacterial Meningitis. New England Journal of Medicine. 351(18). 1849–1859.1024 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Gans, Jan de & Diederik van de Beek. (2003). Dexamethasone in adults with bacterial meningitis - Reply (letter). New England Journal of Medicine. 348(10). 955–956.2 indexed citations
14.
Gans, Jan de & Diederik van de Beek. (2002). Dexamethason gunstig bij volwassenen met acute bacteriële meningitis: een gerandomiseerd placebogecontroleerd onderzoek. Nederlandsch tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/NTvG-databank. 146(47). 2235–2240.1 indexed citations
15.
Gans, Jan de. (2002). Dexamethason in adults with bacterial meningitis. New England Journal of Medicine. 347.2 indexed citations
Danner, S. A., et al.. (1987). Ziekteverschijnselen en klinisch beloop bij de eerste honderd patiënten met AIDS. Nederlandsch tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/NTvG-databank. 131(34). 1474–1481.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.