Jan Broersen

1.6k total citations
51 papers, 473 citations indexed

About

Jan Broersen is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jan Broersen has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 473 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 40 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 6 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Jan Broersen's work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (36 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (26 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (15 papers). Jan Broersen is often cited by papers focused on Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (36 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (26 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (15 papers). Jan Broersen collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, France and Italy. Jan Broersen's co-authors include Leendert van der Torre, Mehdi Dastani, Joris Hulstijn, Nicolas Troquard, Andreas Herzig, Pieter Spronck, H.J. van den Herik, Aske Plaat, Roelf J. Wieringa and Roel Wieringa and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, BMC Public Health and Lecture notes in computer science.

In The Last Decade

Jan Broersen

44 papers receiving 418 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jan Broersen Netherlands 10 396 77 54 50 28 51 473
Jeroen Keppens United Kingdom 11 220 0.6× 42 0.5× 36 0.7× 50 1.0× 9 0.3× 44 403
Andreas Herzig France 17 698 1.8× 79 1.0× 172 3.2× 35 0.7× 35 1.3× 81 797
Andrew Jones United Kingdom 7 307 0.8× 70 0.9× 29 0.5× 52 1.0× 28 1.0× 13 394
Gernot D. Kleiter Austria 11 367 0.9× 25 0.3× 49 0.9× 35 0.7× 35 1.3× 38 584
Helmut Horacek Germany 15 609 1.5× 32 0.4× 37 0.7× 10 0.2× 25 0.9× 73 742
Hans Berliner United States 13 362 0.9× 82 1.1× 34 0.6× 9 0.2× 25 0.9× 40 452
Thomas Icard United States 11 261 0.7× 44 0.6× 72 1.3× 22 0.4× 40 1.4× 47 468
Evelyne Viegas United States 10 293 0.7× 26 0.3× 9 0.2× 19 0.4× 52 1.9× 32 450
Hans van Halteren Netherlands 15 1.1k 2.7× 74 1.0× 25 0.5× 8 0.2× 31 1.1× 56 1.2k
Konstantine Arkoudas United States 9 179 0.5× 42 0.5× 62 1.1× 9 0.2× 10 0.4× 32 279

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Broersen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Broersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Broersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Broersen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Broersen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Broersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Broersen. The network helps show where Jan Broersen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan Broersen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan Broersen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan Broersen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jan Broersen. Jan Broersen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Peterson, Clayton & Jan Broersen. (2023). Understanding the Limits of Explainable Ethical AI. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Tools. 33(3). 3 indexed citations
2.
Zhang, Chao, Marieke A. Adriaanse, Lars Tummers, et al.. (2022). Habit formation of preventive behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal study of physical distancing and hand washing. BMC Public Health. 22(1). 1588–1588. 6 indexed citations
3.
Broersen, Jan, et al.. (2018). Conflicting intentions: rectifying the consistency requirements. Philosophical Studies. 176(4). 1097–1118. 2 indexed citations
4.
Broersen, Jan, et al.. (2018). Formalising Oughts and Practical Knowledge without Resorting to Action Types. Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems. 1877–1879. 1 indexed citations
5.
Spronck, Pieter, et al.. (2013). Towards a Player Age Model. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment. 9(1). 184–190. 3 indexed citations
6.
Spronck, Pieter, et al.. (2013). PsyOps : personality assessment through gaming behavior. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 166–173. 33 indexed citations
7.
Ågotnes, Thomas, Jan Broersen, & Dag Elgesem. (2012). Deontic Logic in Computer Science: 11th International Conference, DEON 2012, Bergen, Norway, July 16-18, 2012. Springer eBooks.
8.
Broersen, Jan. (2011). Deontic epistemic stit logic distinguishing modes of mens rea. Journal of Applied Logic. 9(2). 137–152. 26 indexed citations
9.
Broersen, Jan. (2011). Making a Start with the stit Logic Analysis of Intentional Action. Journal of Philosophical Logic. 40(4). 499–530. 8 indexed citations
10.
Broersen, Jan. (2010). CTL.STIT: enhancing ATL to express important multi-agent system verification properties. Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems. 683–690. 3 indexed citations
11.
Meyer, John‐Jules Ch. & Jan Broersen. (2009). Knowledge Representation for Agents and Multi-Agent Systems: First International Workshop, KRAMAS 2008, Sydney, Australia, September 17, 2008, Revised Selected Papers. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)). 1 indexed citations
12.
Broersen, Jan, Andreas Herzig, & Nicolas Troquard. (2006). A STIT-extension of ATL. Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University).
13.
Dastani, Mehdi, et al.. (2006). Beliefs in Agent Implementation. Lecture notes in computer science. 3904. 1–16. 1 indexed citations
14.
Broersen, Jan, Mehdi Dastani, & Leendert van der Torre. (2005). Beliefs, obligations, intentions, and desires as components in an agent architecture: Research Articles. Journal of Intelligent Systems. 20(9). 893–919. 4 indexed citations
15.
Broersen, Jan. (2004). Action negation and alternative reductions for dynamic deontic logics. Journal of Applied Logic. 2(1). 153–168. 19 indexed citations
16.
Broersen, Jan, et al.. (2003). BDIO CTL: Properties of obligation in agent specification languages. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2 indexed citations
17.
Broersen, Jan, Mehdi Dastani, & Leendert van der Torre. (2003). BDIO: obligations and the specification of agent behavior. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1389–1390. 2 indexed citations
18.
Broersen, Jan. (2002). Relativized Action Complement for Dynamic Logics.. 51–70. 1 indexed citations
19.
Broersen, Jan, Mehdi Dastani, Joris Hulstijn, & Leendert van der Torre. (2002). Goal generation in the BOID architecture. 2. 99 indexed citations
20.
Broersen, Jan, Roel Wieringa, & John-Jules Meyer. (2001). A Fixed-point Characterization of a Deontic Logic of Regular Action. University of Twente Research Information. 48(2). 107–128. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026