James W. Mitchell

64 papers receiving 813 citations

Peers

James W. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Condensed Matter Physics 183
  • Biomaterials 140
  • Analytical Chemistry 99
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 118
  • Radiation 51
Replace W. Eysel with:
W. Eysel Germany
J. C. Vickerman United Kingdom
Nigel J. Clayden United Kingdom
K. Krishnan India
Alexandre Mantion Germany
L. Amaral Brazil
John A. Schreifels United States
John Barnes United States
G. Robert Millward United Kingdom
J. Lambard France
James W. Mitchell relative to W. Eysel Germany W. Eysel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
W. Eysel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James W. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James W. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James W. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James W. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James W. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James W. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James W. Mitchell. The network helps show where James W. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James W. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James W. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together James W. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989182
2 201491
3 201141
4 199638
5 200837
6 198434
7 199222
8 198021
9 201420
10 200919
11 201018
12 197718
13 198218
14 197117
15 201316
16 197816
17 201015
18 197315
19 199115
20 198015

About James W. Mitchell

James W. Mitchell is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Radiation and Organic Chemistry, having authored 66 papers that have together received 899 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear Physics and Applications (9 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (6 papers), Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (5 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (5 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (4 papers), Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (4 papers), biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (3 papers) and Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (183 citations), Biomaterials (140 citations), Analytical Chemistry (99 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (118 citations) and Radiation (51 citations). James W. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Tongxin Wang, L.C. Chow, L. F. Schneemeyer, E. M. Gyorgy, R. Puźniak, K. V. Rao, J. V. Waszczak, R. B. van Dover, T.D. Harris and Mingshu Yang. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, Microchimica Acta, Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions 1 and Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact