James W. Barr

62 total papers · 1.1k total citations
29 papers, 518 citations indexed

About

James W. Barr is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Epidemiology and Small Animals. According to data from OpenAlex, James W. Barr has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 518 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Molecular Biology, 6 papers in Epidemiology and 5 papers in Small Animals. Recurrent topics in James W. Barr's work include Blood transfusion and management (4 papers), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (3 papers) and Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers). James W. Barr is often cited by papers focused on Blood transfusion and management (4 papers), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (3 papers) and Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers). James W. Barr collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Switzerland. James W. Barr's co-authors include Jörg M. Steiner, Jan S. Suchodolski, Blake C. Guard, Lavanya Reddivari, Jairam Vanamala, Daniel Penarete-Acosta, Cory Klemashevich, Romy M. Heilmann, Jonathan A. Lidbury and Frédéric Gaschen and has published in prestigious journals such as Gastroenterology, PLoS ONE and Fertility and Sterility.

In The Last Decade

James W. Barr

27 papers receiving 491 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
James W. Barr 243 164 89 77 72 29 518
Maria Delgado 224 0.9× 80 0.5× 54 0.6× 43 0.6× 35 0.5× 15 569
Tessa M. Andermann 314 1.3× 153 0.9× 39 0.4× 56 0.7× 25 0.3× 29 614
G. Pengo 233 1.0× 119 0.7× 141 1.6× 127 1.6× 89 1.2× 19 448
Adam J. Rudinsky 114 0.5× 57 0.3× 95 1.1× 48 0.6× 141 2.0× 49 456
William J. Martin 118 0.5× 57 0.3× 105 1.2× 41 0.5× 18 0.3× 20 552
Gerald L. Klein 88 0.4× 80 0.5× 93 1.0× 24 0.3× 32 0.4× 43 465
Olivier Dossin 116 0.5× 66 0.4× 119 1.3× 20 0.3× 152 2.1× 27 517
Lichen Xu 129 0.5× 117 0.7× 24 0.3× 50 0.6× 45 0.6× 30 471
Shigeru Tansho 133 0.5× 188 1.1× 47 0.5× 68 0.9× 14 0.2× 37 579
Yoshihiro Eriguchi 216 0.9× 109 0.7× 52 0.6× 40 0.5× 12 0.2× 21 505

Countries citing papers authored by James W. Barr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James W. Barr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James W. Barr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James W. Barr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James W. Barr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James W. Barr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James W. Barr. The network helps show where James W. Barr may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James W. Barr

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James W. Barr. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James W. Barr based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James W. Barr. James W. Barr is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026