James T. Lamer

107 total papers · 823 total citations
54 papers, 549 citations indexed

About

James T. Lamer is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Aquatic Science. According to data from OpenAlex, James T. Lamer has authored 54 papers receiving a total of 549 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 49 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 32 papers in Ecology and 21 papers in Aquatic Science. Recurrent topics in James T. Lamer's work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (47 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (21 papers) and Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (15 papers). James T. Lamer is often cited by papers focused on Fish Ecology and Management Studies (47 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (21 papers) and Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (15 papers). James T. Lamer collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and Australia. James T. Lamer's co-authors include John M. Epifanio, Chad R. Dolan, John K. Tucker, Greg G. Sass, Brent C. Knights, Gregory W. Whitledge, Jessica L. Petersen, John H. Chick, Jon M. Vallazza and Zarema Arbieva and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Science of The Total Environment and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

James T. Lamer

50 papers receiving 522 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
James T. Lamer 398 297 144 133 90 54 549
Quim Pou‐Rovira 402 1.0× 399 1.3× 103 0.7× 195 1.5× 58 0.6× 29 609
Maria Th. Stoumboudi 268 0.7× 156 0.5× 112 0.8× 262 2.0× 99 1.1× 43 507
Hirokazu Urabe 433 1.1× 425 1.4× 117 0.8× 103 0.8× 33 0.4× 33 605
Yahui Zhao 278 0.7× 137 0.5× 141 1.0× 225 1.7× 91 1.0× 59 556
Grethe Robertsen 308 0.8× 298 1.0× 143 1.0× 84 0.6× 110 1.2× 22 506
María J. Servia 234 0.6× 228 0.8× 83 0.6× 102 0.8× 35 0.4× 40 570
Domitilla Pulcini 210 0.5× 127 0.4× 113 0.8× 227 1.7× 98 1.1× 37 514
Josephine Pegg 345 0.9× 404 1.4× 138 1.0× 147 1.1× 26 0.3× 27 574
Costas Perdikaris 193 0.5× 287 1.0× 229 1.6× 290 2.2× 41 0.5× 48 617
Tea Tomljanović 211 0.5× 218 0.7× 65 0.5× 204 1.5× 49 0.5× 50 494

Countries citing papers authored by James T. Lamer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James T. Lamer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James T. Lamer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James T. Lamer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James T. Lamer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James T. Lamer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James T. Lamer. The network helps show where James T. Lamer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James T. Lamer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James T. Lamer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James T. Lamer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James T. Lamer. James T. Lamer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026