James Smith

64 papers receiving 841 citations

Peers

James Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Business and International Management 50
  • Family Practice 33
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 34
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 78
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 204
Replace C.M.J. van Woerkum with:
C.M.J. van Woerkum Netherlands
Lioness Ayres United States
Monique Sternin United States
Jerry Sternin United States
Ruth J. Prince Norway
Geoff Watts United Kingdom
Helen Elsey United Kingdom
Cara L. Cuite United States
Jiao Lü China
Marcos Cueto Brazil
James Smith relative to C.M.J. van Woerkum Netherlands C.M.J. van Woerkum's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
C.M.J. van Woerkum · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Smith. The network helps show where James Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Smith Line = papers co-authored together James Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1974116
2 201484
3 201769
4 200541
5 201940
6 201434
7 201331
8
The Impact of Specialized Benefits Counseling Services on Social Security Administration Disability Beneficiaries in Vermont
200428
9 201427
10 199426
11 201026
12 201623
13 201321
14 200521
15 201321
16 201421
17 201621
18 201317
19
Traumatic arteriovenous fistula between the middle meningeal artery and the sphenoparietal sinus: a case report and review of the world literature.
198117
20 200513

About James Smith

James Smith is a scholar working on Business and International Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Safety Research, Parasitology and Demography, having authored 73 papers that have together received 938 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (12 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (9 papers), Biotechnology and Related Fields (9 papers), Global Health and Surgery (5 papers), Parasites and Host Interactions (4 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (4 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (4 papers) and Retirement, Disability, and Employment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (50 citations), Family Practice (33 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (34 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (78 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (204 citations). James Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Susan C. Welburn, Anna Okello, Joanna Chataway, Mohsen Bazargan, Kevin Bardosh, Ronald S. Lipman, Lino Covi, David Wield, Hamed Yazdanshenas and Rebecca Hanlin. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS neglected tropical diseases, Science and Public Policy, Journal of rehabilitation, IDS Bulletin and Pastoralism Research Policy and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026