Countries citing papers authored by James S. Border
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of James S. Border's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James S. Border with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James S. Border more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James S. Border. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James S. Border. The network helps show where James S. Border may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James S. Border
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James S. Border.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James S. Border based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James S. Border. James S. Border is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bagri, D. S., et al.. (2014). Advanced Calibration Technique for Accurate Three-Way Spacecraft Ranging. 1–11.1 indexed citations
5.
Border, James S., et al.. (2013). Delta-DOR: The One-Nanoradian Navigation Measurement System of the Deep Space Network --- History, Architecture, and Componentry. 1–46.27 indexed citations
6.
Border, James S. & Meegyeong Paik. (2009). Station Delay Calibration for Ranging Measurements. 1–14.4 indexed citations
7.
Jones, Dayton L., Ed Fomalont, V. Dhawan, et al.. (2009). VLBA Observations of Cassini to Improve the Saturn Ephemeris. 213. 47.1 indexed citations
8.
Border, James S.. (2009). Innovations in Delta Differential One-Way Range: From Viking to Mars Science Laboratory. 1.3 indexed citations
Lanyi, G. E., James S. Border, J. A. Benson, et al.. (2005). Determination of Angular Separation Between Spacecraft and Quasars with the Very Long Baseline Array. 1–16.7 indexed citations
11.
Folkner, W. M., James S. Border, S. Lowe, R. A. Preston, & M. K. Bird. (2004). Ground-based tracking of the Huygens Probe during the Titan descent. 544. 191–196.2 indexed citations
Folkner, W. M., et al.. (1996). Earth-Based Observation of Galileo Probe for Jupiter Wind Estimation. DPS.1 indexed citations
14.
Dunn, Charles, S. M. Lichten, D. Jefferson, & James S. Border. (1992). Subnanosecond GPS-based clock synchronization and precision deep-space tracking. Telecommunications and Data Acquisition Progress Report. 111. 1–10.3 indexed citations
15.
Border, James S., et al.. (1992). Precise tracking of the Magellan and Pioneer Venusorbiters by same-beam interferometry. Part 1: Dataaccuracy analysis. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 110. 1–20.1 indexed citations
16.
Border, James S. & W. M. Folkner. (1990). Differential spacecraft tracking by interferometry. 643–654.
17.
Sovers, O. J. & James S. Border. (1988). Observation model and parameter partials for the JPL geodetic GPS modeling software GPSOMC. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 8721.17 indexed citations
18.
Lichten, S. M., Willy Bertiger, & James S. Border. (1988). Precision GPS orbit determination strategies for an earth orbiter and geodetic tracking system. 1133–1155.1 indexed citations
Davidson, J. M., C. L. Thornton, S. A. Stephens, et al.. (1986). Demonstration of the Fiducial Concept Using Data From the March 1985 GPS Field Test. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 86. 301–306.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.