James Requa

20 papers receiving 400 citations

Peers

James Requa
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Health Informatics 16
  • Oncology 276
  • Gastroenterology 54
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 208
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 137
Replace Andrew Ninh with:
Andrew Ninh United States
Tyler Dao United States
Florian Soudan Canada
Takahide Shinagawa Japan
Maarten R. Struyvenberg Netherlands
Joost van der Putten Netherlands
Katsuro Ichimasa Japan
Fanhua Ming China
Kiki Fockens Netherlands
João Afonso Portugal
James Requa relative to Andrew Ninh United States Andrew Ninh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Andrew Ninh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Requa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Requa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Requa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Requa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Requa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Requa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Requa. The network helps show where James Requa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Requa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Requa Line = papers co-authored together James Requa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020151
2 202092
3 201991
4 202131
5 20227
6 20187
7 20186
8 20196
9 20185
10 20184
11 20183
12 20193
13 20183
14 20213
15 20212
16 20212
17 20182
18 20182
19 20251
20 20191

About James Requa

James Requa is a scholar working on Oncology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 22 papers that have together received 422 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (12 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (9 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (5 papers), AI in cancer detection (4 papers), Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (3 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (2 papers) and Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (16 citations), Oncology (276 citations), Gastroenterology (54 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (208 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (137 citations). James Requa has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and India. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Ninh, Tyler Dao, Jason Samarasena, William E. Karnes, William E. Karnes, Rintaro Hashimoto, Elise Tran, Kenneth J. Chang, Rony Zachariah and Efren Rael. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Gastroenterology, Journal of Crohn s and Colitis and Journal of Pathology Informatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact