James R. Usherwood

3.6k total citations
65 papers, 2.7k citations indexed

About

James R. Usherwood is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, James R. Usherwood has authored 65 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 33 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 21 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in James R. Usherwood's work include Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms (32 papers), Robotic Locomotion and Control (31 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (13 papers). James R. Usherwood is often cited by papers focused on Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms (32 papers), Robotic Locomotion and Control (31 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (13 papers). James R. Usherwood collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. James R. Usherwood's co-authors include Charles P. Ellington, Alan M. Wilson, Andrew A. Biewener, Monica A. Daley, Tyson L. Hedrick, Fritz‐Olaf Lehmann, Tatjana Y. Hubel, Steven J. Portugal, John E. A. Bertram and Johannes Fritz and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

James R. Usherwood

63 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James R. Usherwood United Kingdom 28 1.4k 748 610 543 532 65 2.7k
Sharon M. Swartz United States 37 1.9k 1.4× 505 0.7× 1.5k 2.5× 754 1.4× 492 0.9× 113 3.9k
Thomas L. Daniel United States 34 1.0k 0.7× 522 0.7× 675 1.1× 631 1.2× 288 0.5× 64 3.4k
J.L. van Leeuwen Netherlands 38 1.2k 0.9× 1.2k 1.6× 545 0.9× 865 1.6× 325 0.6× 156 4.8k
Bret W. Tobalske United States 37 2.2k 1.6× 380 0.5× 1.4k 2.3× 1.6k 2.9× 460 0.9× 119 3.9k
T. L. Daniel United States 23 1.4k 1.0× 412 0.6× 387 0.6× 340 0.6× 498 0.9× 45 2.6k
Tyson L. Hedrick United States 37 3.1k 2.2× 951 1.3× 1.5k 2.5× 1.2k 2.2× 824 1.5× 109 5.4k
William I. Sellers United Kingdom 37 383 0.3× 649 0.9× 381 0.6× 379 0.7× 310 0.6× 147 3.8k
Frank E. Fish United States 45 3.6k 2.6× 874 1.2× 627 1.0× 2.0k 3.7× 1.2k 2.2× 158 6.8k
S. N. Patek United States 37 477 0.3× 900 1.2× 1.0k 1.7× 1.1k 2.0× 154 0.3× 77 4.1k
Martin S. Fischer Germany 35 252 0.2× 923 1.2× 640 1.0× 466 0.9× 136 0.3× 135 3.6k

Countries citing papers authored by James R. Usherwood

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James R. Usherwood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James R. Usherwood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James R. Usherwood more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James R. Usherwood

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James R. Usherwood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James R. Usherwood. The network helps show where James R. Usherwood may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James R. Usherwood

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James R. Usherwood. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James R. Usherwood based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James R. Usherwood. James R. Usherwood is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Usherwood, James R.. (2025). Limiting and optimal Strouhal numbers or tip speed ratios for cruising propulsion by fins, flukes, wings and propellers. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 22(222). 20240730–20240730. 1 indexed citations
3.
Song, Jialei, et al.. (2024). Investigation of models to estimate flight performance of gliding birds from wakes. Physics of Fluids. 36(9). 91912–91912.
4.
Usherwood, James R.. (2023). The collisional geometry of economical walking predicts human leg and foot segment proportions. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 20(200). 20220800–20220800. 2 indexed citations
5.
Cheney, Jorn A., et al.. (2023). Dynamics of hinged wings in strong upward gusts. Royal Society Open Science. 10(5). 221607–221607. 2 indexed citations
6.
Cheney, Jorn A., Jialei Song, D. Smith, et al.. (2021). Raptor wing morphing with flight speed. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 18(180). 20210349–20210349. 34 indexed citations
7.
Cheney, Jorn A., et al.. (2020). Bird wings act as a suspension system that rejects gusts. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 287(1937). 20201748–20201748. 35 indexed citations
8.
Usherwood, James R., et al.. (2019). Minimalist analogue robot discovers animal-like walking gaits. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics. 15(2). 26004–26004. 4 indexed citations
9.
Usherwood, James R., et al.. (2018). The scaling or ontogeny of human gait kinetics and walk-run transition: The implications of work vs. peak power minimization. Journal of Biomechanics. 81. 12–21. 9 indexed citations
10.
Usherwood, James R., et al.. (2018). The grazing gait, and implications of toppling table geometry for primate footfall sequences. Biology Letters. 14(5). 20180137–20180137. 9 indexed citations
11.
Portugal, Steven J., Tatjana Y. Hubel, Johannes Fritz, et al.. (2014). Upwash exploitation and downwash avoidance by flap phasing in ibis formation flight. Nature. 505(7483). 399–402. 257 indexed citations
12.
Usherwood, James R.. (2013). Constraints on muscle performance provide a novel explanation for the scaling of posture in terrestrial animals. Biology Letters. 9(4). 20130414–20130414. 31 indexed citations
13.
Hubel, Tatjana Y. & James R. Usherwood. (2013). Vaulting mechanics successfully predict decrease in walk–run transition speed with incline. Biology Letters. 9(2). 20121121–20121121. 8 indexed citations
14.
Usherwood, James R., et al.. (2012). The human foot and heel–sole–toe walking strategy: a mechanism enabling an inverted pendular gait with low isometric muscle force?. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 9(75). 2396–2402. 47 indexed citations
15.
Usherwood, James R. & Tatjana Y. Hubel. (2012). Energetically optimal running requires torques about the centre of mass. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 9(73). 2011–2015. 12 indexed citations
16.
Usherwood, James R., et al.. (2011). The extraordinary athletic performance of leaping gibbons. Biology Letters. 8(1). 46–49. 18 indexed citations
17.
Usherwood, James R., et al.. (2011). Flying in a flock comes at a cost in pigeons. Nature. 474(7352). 494–497. 106 indexed citations
18.
Usherwood, James R. & Fritz‐Olaf Lehmann. (2008). Phasing of dragonfly wings can improve aerodynamic efficiency by removing swirl. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 5(28). 1303–1307. 123 indexed citations
19.
Usherwood, James R.. (2008). The aerodynamic forces and pressure distribution of a revolving pigeon wing. Experiments in Fluids. 46(5). 991–1003. 53 indexed citations
20.
Usherwood, James R., et al.. (2007). Acceleration in the racing greyhound. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Molecular & Integrative Physiology. 146(4). S110–S110. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026