Countries citing papers authored by James R. Reddell
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of James R. Reddell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James R. Reddell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James R. Reddell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James R. Reddell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James R. Reddell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James R. Reddell. The network helps show where James R. Reddell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James R. Reddell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James R. Reddell.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James R. Reddell based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James R. Reddell. James R. Reddell is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Elliott, William R., James R. Reddell, D. Craig Rudolph, et al.. (2017). The Cave Fauna of California. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).5 indexed citations
Cokendolpher, James C., James R. Reddell, & W. David Sissom. (2010). A new species of Apozomus (Arachnida: Schizomida: Hubbardiidae) from peninsular Malaysia /. Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution).
6.
Cokendolpher, James C., et al.. (2009). Further ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from caves of Texas. 151–168.8 indexed citations
7.
Adis, Joachim, Alexandre B. Bonaldo, Antônio D. Brescovit, et al.. (2002). Arachnida at "Reserva Ducke", Central Amazonia/Brazil. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 17. 1–14.12 indexed citations
8.
Cokendolpher, James C. & James R. Reddell. (2000). New and rare Schizomida (Arachnida: Hubbardiidae) from South America. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society). 16. 187–212.21 indexed citations
9.
Adis, Joachim, James R. Reddell, James C. Cokendolpher, & José Wellington de Morais. (1999). Abundance and phenology of Schizomida (Archnida) from a primary upland forest in Central Amazonia.. Journal of Arachnology. 27(1). 205–210.6 indexed citations
Reddell, James R. & James C. Cokendolpher. (1991). Redescription of Schizomus crassicaudatus (Pickard-Cambridge) and Diagnoses of Hubbardia cook, Stenochrus chamberlin, and Sotanostenochrus new genus, with Description of a New Species of Hubbardia from California (Arachnida: Schizomida: Hubbardiidae). Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library).16 indexed citations
12.
Reddell, James R.. (1985). A Checklist and Bibliography of the Iapygoidea (Insecta: Diplura) of South America. Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library).2 indexed citations
Reddell, James R.. (1981). A Review of the Cavernicole Fauna of Mexico, Guatemala, and Belize. Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library).87 indexed citations
Wygodzinsky, Pedro W. & James R. Reddell. (1973). Description of a new genus of cave thysanuran from Texas (Nicoletiidae, Thysanura, Insecta). American Museum novitates ; no. 2518. American Museum Novitates.3 indexed citations
19.
Reddell, James R.. (1967). A checklist of the cave fauna of Texas III Vertebrata. 19(2). 184–226.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.