James P. McLean

737 total citations
24 papers, 482 citations indexed

About

James P. McLean is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Surgery and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, James P. McLean has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 482 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 10 papers in Surgery and 5 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in James P. McLean's work include Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (7 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (5 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (4 papers). James P. McLean is often cited by papers focused on Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (7 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (5 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (4 papers). James P. McLean collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. James P. McLean's co-authors include Gerard A. Malanga, Scott F. Nadler, Joshua Rittenberg, Christopher T. Plastaras, Christine P. Hendon, Cynthia Garvan, Steven P. Stanos, Ramin Zareian, Charles A. DiMarzio and Jeffrey W. Ruberti and has published in prestigious journals such as Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, Optics Letters and Optics Express.

In The Last Decade

James P. McLean

21 papers receiving 449 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James P. McLean United States 11 288 146 142 85 57 24 482
John E. Tis United States 17 564 2.0× 188 1.3× 100 0.7× 102 1.2× 21 0.4× 39 791
Fjóla Jóhannesdóttir United States 14 372 1.3× 146 1.0× 458 3.2× 45 0.5× 61 1.1× 28 675
Klaus Birnbaum Germany 14 748 2.6× 130 0.9× 142 1.0× 203 2.4× 24 0.4× 33 841
Bobby Anand United Kingdom 8 281 1.0× 57 0.4× 156 1.1× 90 1.1× 44 0.8× 11 427
Rogério Pereira Portugal 12 310 1.1× 83 0.6× 294 2.1× 13 0.2× 13 0.2× 18 499
Stephen J. Straub United States 10 279 1.0× 193 1.3× 213 1.5× 52 0.6× 42 0.7× 12 400
John Cheung Netherlands 11 412 1.4× 57 0.4× 45 0.3× 92 1.1× 37 0.6× 22 559
Gunther Windisch Austria 13 326 1.1× 54 0.4× 66 0.5× 40 0.5× 56 1.0× 21 446
Daniel M. Walz United States 8 484 1.7× 60 0.4× 174 1.2× 180 2.1× 22 0.4× 14 581
Jennica J. Tucker United States 13 385 1.3× 27 0.2× 271 1.9× 20 0.2× 30 0.5× 22 506

Countries citing papers authored by James P. McLean

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James P. McLean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James P. McLean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James P. McLean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James P. McLean

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James P. McLean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James P. McLean. The network helps show where James P. McLean may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James P. McLean

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James P. McLean. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James P. McLean based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James P. McLean. James P. McLean is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
McLean, James P. & Christine P. Hendon. (2021). 3-D compressed sensing optical coherence tomography using predictive coding. Biomedical Optics Express. 12(4). 2531–2531. 8 indexed citations
2.
McLean, James P., et al.. (2021). Anisotropic Mechanical Properties of the Human Uterus Measured by Spherical Indentation. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 49(8). 1923–1942. 27 indexed citations
3.
McLean, James P., et al.. (2020). Three-dimensional collagen fiber mapping and tractography of human uterine tissue using OCT. Biomedical Optics Express. 11(10). 5518–5518. 14 indexed citations
4.
McLean, James P., et al.. (2019). High-speed collagen fiber modeling and orientation quantification for optical coherence tomography imaging. Optics Express. 27(10). 14457–14457. 16 indexed citations
5.
McLean, James P., Fernando Quivira, & Deniz Erdoğmuş. (2018). Improved classification in tactile BCIs using a noisy label model. PubMed. 7. 757–761. 2 indexed citations
7.
McLean, James P., Yuye Ling, & Christine P. Hendon. (2017). Frequency-constrained robust principal component analysis: a sparse representation approach to segmentation of dynamic features in optical coherence tomography imaging. Optics Express. 25(21). 25819–25819. 7 indexed citations
8.
Zareian, Ramin, Monica E. Susilo, Jeffrey A. Paten, et al.. (2016). Human Corneal Fibroblast Pattern Evolution and Matrix Synthesis on Mechanically Biased Substrates. Tissue Engineering Part A. 22(19-20). 1204–1217. 13 indexed citations
9.
McLean, James P.. (2015). A linear method for quantification of collagen fiber orientation in Cornea. 13. 1–2. 1 indexed citations
10.
Goldstein, Neil, Rainer A. Dressler, Robert M. Shroll, et al.. (2013). Ground Testing of Prototype Hardware and Processing Algorithms for a Wide Area Space Surveillance System (WASSS). amos.
11.
McLean, James P., et al.. (2013). The arrangement of fibrous collagen in cornea using second harmonic generation (SHG) microscopy. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 8588. 85881N–85881N. 1 indexed citations
12.
Visco, Christopher J., David J. Kennedy, Joshua Rittenberg, et al.. (2012). Programmatic Design for Teaching the Introductory Skills and Concepts of Lumbar Spine Procedures to Physiatry Residents. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 92(3). 248–257. 8 indexed citations
13.
Zareian, Ramin, et al.. (2012). Quantification of lamellar orientation in corneal collagen using second harmonic generation images. Optics Letters. 37(16). 3312–3312. 42 indexed citations
15.
Datta, D., et al.. (2008). A comparative evaluation of the Adaptive® knee and Catech® knee joints. Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 32(1). 84–92. 14 indexed citations
16.
Garvan, Cynthia, et al.. (2008). Poster 236: Digital Subtraction—Does It Matter?: The Rate of Intravascular Uptake in Cervical Epidural Steroid Injections With and Without Digital Subtraction. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 89(11). e96–e96. 1 indexed citations
17.
Stanos, Steven P., et al.. (2007). Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Approach to Pain. Medical Clinics of North America. 91(1). 57–95. 16 indexed citations
18.
Stanos, Steven P., et al.. (2007). Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Approach to Pain. Anesthesiology Clinics. 25(4). 721–759. 22 indexed citations
19.
Malanga, Gerard A., et al.. (2005). Physical examination of the knee: A review of the original test description and scientific validity of common orthopedic tests (Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:592-603):Vertaling: L. Eenkhoorn. 38 indexed citations
20.
Malanga, Gerard A., et al.. (2003). Physical examination of the knee: A review of the original test description and scientific validity of common orthopedic tests. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 84(4). 592–603. 170 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026