Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization
2001518 citationsJames MilroyJournal of Sociolinguisticsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of James Milroy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Milroy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Milroy more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Milroy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Milroy. The network helps show where James Milroy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Milroy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Milroy.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Milroy based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James Milroy. James Milroy is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Milroy, James & Lesley Milroy. (2014). Real English.1 indexed citations
2.
Milroy, James & Lesley Milroy. (2014). Real English: The Grammar Of English Dialects In The British Isles. Medical Entomology and Zoology.35 indexed citations
Milroy, James. (2001). Received Pronunciation: Who "Receives" It and How Long Will It Be "Received"?. Repozytorium Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza (Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań). 15.9 indexed citations
7.
Milroy, James. (2001). Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 5(4). 530–555.518 indexed citations breakdown →
Milroy, Lesley, et al.. (1999). Phonological Variation and Change in Contemporary English: Evidence from Newcastle upon Tyne and Derby = Variación y cambio fonológico en inglés contemporáneo: Evidencias desde Newcastle upon Tyne y Derby. 8(1). 35–46.3 indexed citations
10.
Milroy, Lesley, James Milroy, & Gerard Docherty. (1999). PHONOLOGYCAL VARIATION AND CHANGE IN CONTEMPORARY ENGLISH: EVIDENCE FROM NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE AND DERBY. Hispana. 8.6 indexed citations
Milroy, James & Lesley Milroy. (1985). Authority in language: Investigating language prescription and standardisation. Medical Entomology and Zoology.208 indexed citations
19.
Milroy, James & John Harris. (1980). When is a merger not a merger?. English World-Wide A Journal of Varieties of English. 1(2). 199–210.18 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.