This map shows the geographic impact of James McAdams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James McAdams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James McAdams more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James McAdams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James McAdams. The network helps show where James McAdams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James McAdams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James McAdams.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James McAdams based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James McAdams. James McAdams is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wibben, Daniel R., James McAdams, Peter G. Antreasian, et al.. (2022). OSIRIS-REx Orbit Trim Strategy. AIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum.2 indexed citations
2.
Englander, Jacob A., et al.. (2019). Trajectory Design of the Lucy Mission to Explore the Diversity of the Jupiter Trojans.4 indexed citations
3.
Englander, Jacob A., et al.. (2019). Optimization of the Lucy Interplanetary Trajectory via Two-Point Direct Shooting.2 indexed citations
McAdams, James, et al.. (2012). Spaceflight mechanics 2012 : Proceedings of the 22nd AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting held January 29 to February 2, 2012, Charleston, South Carolina.1 indexed citations
6.
McAdams, James. (2012). “Dese Funny Folks. Glad I Ain’t None of Them”: An Onomastic Inquiry into Faulkner’s The Sound and the Fury. SUNY Digital Repository Support (State University of New York System). 2(1). 3.
McAdams, James, Robert W. Farquhar, A. H. Taylor, & B. G. Williams. (2007). MESSENGER Mission Design and Navigation. Space Science Reviews. 131(1-4). 219–246.26 indexed citations
Dunham, David, James McAdams, & Robert W. Farquhar. (2002). NEAR mission design. Johns Hopkins APL technical digest. 23(1). 18–33.8 indexed citations
13.
Farquhar, Robert W., Edward Belbruno, David Dunham, Yanping Guo, & James McAdams. (2002). Utilization of Libration Points an Halo Orbits for Human Space Exploration in the Sun-Earth-Moon System an Beyond. 725.1 indexed citations
14.
Oleson, Steven R., et al.. (2001). Sub-Kilowatt Radioisotope Electric Propulsion for Outer Solar System Exploration. 32.8 indexed citations
15.
Dunham, David, Robert W. Farquhar, James McAdams, et al.. (2000). Recovery of near's mission to eros. Acta Astronautica. 47(2-9). 503–512.13 indexed citations
Miller, James, Peter G. Antreasian, B. G. Williams, et al.. (1999). Near Earth Asteroid Rendezvous (NEAR) Revised Eros Orbit Phase Trajectory Design. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 57505.1 indexed citations
18.
Antreasian, Peter G., James Miller, W. M. Owen, et al.. (1999). Preliminary Planning for NEAR's Low-Altitude Operations at 433 Eros. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).7 indexed citations
19.
Yeomans, D. K., Jean‐Pierre Barriot, David Dunham, et al.. (1997). The NEAR Spacecraft's Flyby of Asteroid 253 Mathilde. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).1 indexed citations
20.
McAdams, James, et al.. (1990). A Planetary Small Missions Program Using Small Spacecraft. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 21. 212.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.