James Makous

827 total citations
16 papers, 593 citations indexed

About

James Makous is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pharmacology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, James Makous has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 593 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 6 papers in Pharmacology and 6 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in James Makous's work include Pain Management and Treatment (9 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers) and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers). James Makous is often cited by papers focused on Pain Management and Treatment (9 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers) and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers). James Makous collaborates with scholars based in United States, Vietnam and Australia. James Makous's co-authors include John C. Middlebrooks, David M. Green, George A. Gescheider, Stanley J. Bolanowski, William W. O’Neill, Robert M. Friedman, Charles J. Vierck, Amitabh Gulati, Hemant Kalia and Krishnan Chakravarthy and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Experimental Brain Research and Hearing Research.

In The Last Decade

James Makous

15 papers receiving 545 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James Makous United States 9 456 167 159 145 95 16 593
Ross K. Maddox United States 15 542 1.2× 54 0.3× 305 1.9× 235 1.6× 162 1.7× 43 964
W. Owen Brimijoin United Kingdom 16 490 1.1× 179 1.1× 180 1.1× 186 1.3× 81 0.9× 37 606
Sandra J. Guzman United States 6 523 1.1× 227 1.4× 130 0.8× 207 1.4× 153 1.6× 10 628
Zachary M. Smith United States 11 1.2k 2.5× 414 2.5× 160 1.0× 380 2.6× 573 6.0× 15 1.2k
Roy D. Patterson United Kingdom 10 679 1.5× 144 0.9× 137 0.9× 232 1.6× 131 1.4× 13 783
Hedwig E. Gockel United Kingdom 15 793 1.7× 267 1.6× 161 1.0× 205 1.4× 235 2.5× 47 847
Frédéric Berthommier France 18 412 0.9× 114 0.7× 264 1.7× 375 2.6× 176 1.9× 55 817
David M. Green United States 7 837 1.8× 316 1.9× 309 1.9× 206 1.4× 228 2.4× 7 991
Ewan A. Macpherson Canada 15 886 1.9× 319 1.9× 264 1.7× 261 1.8× 275 2.9× 42 960
Simon Parker Australia 9 358 0.8× 148 0.9× 159 1.0× 104 0.7× 53 0.6× 14 495

Countries citing papers authored by James Makous

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Makous's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Makous with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Makous more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Makous

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Makous. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Makous. The network helps show where James Makous may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Makous

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Makous. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Makous based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Makous. James Makous is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Gutierrez, Genaro, Leonardo Kapural, Gregory Moore, et al.. (2024). Clinical study of a micro-implantable pulse generator for the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain: 12-month results from the COMFORT-randomized controlled trial. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. 51(3). 278–284. 5 indexed citations
2.
Gutierrez, Genaro, Leonardo Kapural, Gregory Moore, et al.. (2024). Clinical study of a micro-implantable pulse generator for the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain: 3-month and 6-month results from the COMFORT-randomised controlled trial. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. 50(7). 561–567. 5 indexed citations
3.
Desai, Mehul J., Cindy Ung, Mayank Gupta, et al.. (2024). Composite Treatment Response from a Prospective, Multi-Center Study (US-nPower) Evaluating a Miniature Spinal Cord Stimulator for the Management of Chronic, Intractable Pain.. PubMed. 27(8). E881–E889.
4.
Gutierrez, Genaro, Leonardo Kapural, Gregory Moore, et al.. (2024). Design of a Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial for the Treatment of Peripheral Neuropathic Pain (COMFORT Study) with a Micro-Implantable Pulse Generator. Journal of Pain Research. Volume 17. 2891–2901. 1 indexed citations
5.
Salmon, John F., D. Bates, Paul Verrills, et al.. (2024). Treating Chronic, Intractable Pain with a Miniaturized Spinal Cord Stimulation System: 1-Year Outcomes from the AUS-nPower Study During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Pain Research. Volume 17. 293–304. 2 indexed citations
6.
Desai, Mehul J., Leo Kapural, Mayank Gupta, et al.. (2023). Results From a Prospective, Clinical Study (US-nPower) Evaluating a Miniature Spinal Cord Stimulator for the Management of Chronic, Intractable Pain.. PubMed. 26(7). 575–584. 2 indexed citations
7.
Salmon, John F., D. Bates, Paul Verrills, et al.. (2023). Early Experience With a Novel Miniaturized Spinal Cord Stimulation System for the Management of Chronic Intractable Pain of the Back and Legs. Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface. 26(1). 172–181. 9 indexed citations
8.
Kalia, Hemant, et al.. (2022). Application of the Novel Nalu™ Neurostimulation System for Peripheral Nerve Stimulation. Pain Management. 12(7). 795–804. 11 indexed citations
9.
Poree, Lawrence, et al.. (2019). Abstract #46: Stimulation Patterns: Convergence and Divergence of Neurophysiological Effects in Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS). Brain stimulation. 12(2). e16–e17. 1 indexed citations
10.
Makous, James, Robert M. Friedman, & Charles J. Vierck. (1996). Effects of a dorsal column lesion on temporal processing within the somatosensory system of primates. Experimental Brain Research. 112(2). 253–267. 16 indexed citations
11.
Makous, James, George A. Gescheider, & Stanley J. Bolanowski. (1996). Decay in the effect of vibrotactile masking. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 99(2). 1124–1129. 9 indexed citations
12.
Makous, James, George A. Gescheider, & Stanley J. Bolanowski. (1996). The effects of static indentation on vibrotactile threshold. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 99(5). 3149–3153. 18 indexed citations
13.
Gescheider, George A., et al.. (1995). Vibrotactile forward masking: Effects of the amplitude and duration of the masking stimulus. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 98(6). 3188–3194. 21 indexed citations
14.
Makous, James & John C. Middlebrooks. (1990). Two-dimensional sound localization by human listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 87(5). 2188–2200. 320 indexed citations
15.
Middlebrooks, John C., James Makous, & David M. Green. (1989). Directional sensitivity of sound-pressure levels in the human ear canal. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 86(1). 89–108. 159 indexed citations
16.
Makous, James & William W. O’Neill. (1986). Directional sensitivity of the auditory midbrain in the mustached bat to free-field tones. Hearing Research. 24(1). 73–88. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026