James Lill

2.9k total citations · 2 hit papers
23 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

James Lill is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry and Mechanical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, James Lill has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 10 papers in Materials Chemistry and 5 papers in Mechanical Engineering. Recurrent topics in James Lill's work include Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (4 papers) and nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (4 papers). James Lill is often cited by papers focused on Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (4 papers) and nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (4 papers). James Lill collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Bulgaria. James Lill's co-authors include J. C. Light, Ian Hamilton, Gregory A. Parker, John C. Light, Jeremy Q. Broughton, Michael I. Haftel, T.D. Andreadis, Youhai Wen, Jeff Simmons and M. I. Haftel and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

In The Last Decade

James Lill

23 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Hit Papers

Generalized discrete variable approximation in quantum me... 1982 2026 1996 2011 1985 1982 400 800 1.2k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James Lill United States 14 2.1k 777 261 252 230 23 2.4k
Brian K. Kendrick United States 35 2.6k 1.2× 1.1k 1.4× 236 0.9× 520 2.1× 191 0.8× 96 3.1k
Eric A. Gislason United States 30 2.2k 1.0× 1.1k 1.5× 248 1.0× 400 1.6× 157 0.7× 120 2.6k
E. E. Nikitin Germany 30 2.5k 1.2× 1.1k 1.4× 306 1.2× 476 1.9× 260 1.1× 178 3.1k
Wojciech Cencek Poland 32 2.4k 1.2× 718 0.9× 252 1.0× 334 1.3× 83 0.4× 49 2.8k
F. B. Dunning United States 37 4.4k 2.1× 1.4k 1.8× 262 1.0× 179 0.7× 241 1.0× 240 4.8k
Bill Poirier United States 28 1.8k 0.8× 942 1.2× 132 0.5× 308 1.2× 236 1.0× 114 2.1k
Tak‐San Ho United States 33 3.3k 1.6× 1.1k 1.4× 359 1.4× 425 1.7× 230 1.0× 127 3.8k
R. E. Raab South Africa 23 1.3k 0.6× 496 0.6× 203 0.8× 95 0.4× 194 0.8× 88 1.8k
Roman V. Krems Canada 36 4.4k 2.1× 1.2k 1.5× 400 1.5× 222 0.9× 167 0.7× 133 5.0k
Marie-Anne Bouchiat France 26 2.6k 1.3× 793 1.0× 245 0.9× 57 0.2× 115 0.5× 97 3.5k

Countries citing papers authored by James Lill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Lill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Lill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Lill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Lill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Lill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Lill. The network helps show where James Lill may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Lill

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Lill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Lill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Lill. James Lill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Woodward, C., et al.. (2010). Ab initio simulations of molten Ni alloys. Journal of Applied Physics. 107(11). 31 indexed citations
2.
Wen, Youhai, et al.. (2009). A ternary phase-field model incorporating commercial CALPHAD software and its application to precipitation in superalloys. Acta Materialia. 58(3). 875–885. 49 indexed citations
3.
Woodward, C., Mark Asta, Dallas R. Trinkle, James Lill, & Stefano Angioletti‐Uberti. (2008). Ab-initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Molten Ni-Based Superalloys. 169–174. 3 indexed citations
4.
Lill, James & Jeremy Q. Broughton. (2001). Atomistic simulations with slip boundary conditions. Physical review. B, Condensed matter. 63(14). 9 indexed citations
5.
Lill, James & Jeremy Q. Broughton. (2000). Interfacial free energy calculations via virtual slip. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 8(3). 345–355. 3 indexed citations
6.
Lill, James & Jeremy Q. Broughton. (2000). Molecular Dynamics Simulation of a Glissile Dislocation Interface Propagating a Martensitic Transformation. Physical Review Letters. 84(25). 5784–5787. 4 indexed citations
7.
Lill, James & Jeremy Q. Broughton. (2000). Linear and nonlinear elasticity in atomistic simulations. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. 8(3). 357–375. 4 indexed citations
8.
Broughton, Jeremy Q., James Lill, & J. Karl Johnson. (1997). C60sphase diagram: A full free-energy analysis. Physical review. B, Condensed matter. 55(5). 2808–2817. 22 indexed citations
9.
Lill, James, A Skinner, & J. Q. Broughton. (1997). The calculation of interfacial free energies via λ integration. Journal of Phase Equilibria. 18(6). 495–498. 5 indexed citations
10.
Lill, James. (1994). The integration of molecular dynamics simulations with imposed temperature and stress. Computer Physics Communications. 79(2). 219–248. 1 indexed citations
11.
Godbey, D. J., et al.. (1994). Ge surface segregation at low temperature during SiGe growth by molecular beam epitaxy. Applied Physics Letters. 65(6). 711–713. 40 indexed citations
12.
Lill, James & Jeremy Q. Broughton. (1992). Nonlinear molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo algorithms. Physical review. B, Condensed matter. 46(18). 12068–12071. 17 indexed citations
13.
Haftel, Michael I., et al.. (1990). Surface relaxation of α-iron and the embedded-atom method. Physical review. B, Condensed matter. 42(18). 11540–11552. 52 indexed citations
14.
Lill, James, et al.. (1989). A time-dependent variational principle and the time-dependent Hartree approximation in hydrodynamical form. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 90(9). 4933–4939. 1 indexed citations
15.
Lill, James, et al.. (1989). Mixed state quantum mechanics in hydrodynamical form. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 90(9). 4940–4950. 18 indexed citations
16.
Lill, James, Gregory A. Parker, & John C. Light. (1986). The discrete variable–finite basis approach to quantum scattering. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 85(2). 900–910. 110 indexed citations
17.
Light, J. C., Ian Hamilton, & James Lill. (1985). Generalized discrete variable approximation in quantum mechanics. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 82(3). 1400–1409. 1486 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Lill, James & Donald J. Kouri. (1984). Comparisons of approximate and exact quantal molecule—surface scattering calculations. Chemical Physics Letters. 112(3). 249–257. 21 indexed citations
19.
Lill, James, Thomas Schmalz, & J. C. Light. (1983). Imbedded matrix Green’s functions in atomic and molecular scattering theory. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 78(7). 4456–4463. 25 indexed citations
20.
Lill, James, Gregory A. Parker, & J. C. Light. (1982). Discrete variable representations and sudden models in quantum scattering theory. Chemical Physics Letters. 89(6). 483–489. 487 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026