Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
From work with men and boys to changes of social norms and reduction of inequities in gender relations: a conceptual shift in prevention of violence against women and girls
2014496 citationsRachel Jewkes, Michael Flood et al.The Lancetprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of James Lang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Lang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Lang more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Lang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Lang. The network helps show where James Lang may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Lang
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Lang.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Lang based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James Lang. James Lang is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Fulu, Emma, Andrew Gibbs, Jessica Jacobson, et al.. (2015). What works to prevent violence against women and girls evidence reviews.9 indexed citations
2.
Fulu, Emma, Andrew Gibbs, Jessica Jacobson, et al.. (2015). What works to prevent violence against women and girls evidence reviews Paper 2: Interventions to prevent violence against women and girls.17 indexed citations
3.
Jewkes, Rachel, Michael Flood, & James Lang. (2014). From work with men and boys to changes of social norms and reduction of inequities in gender relations: a conceptual shift in prevention of violence against women and girls. The Lancet. 385(9977). 1580–1589.496 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Jewkes, Rachel, Michael Flood, & James Lang. (2014). Violence against women and girls 3 From work with men and boys to changes of social norms and reduction of inequities in gender relations: a conceptual shift in prevention of violence against women and girls.8 indexed citations
5.
Fulu, Emma, et al.. (2013). Why Do Some Men Use Violence Against Women and How Can We Prevent It? Quantitative Findings from the United Nations Multi-country Study on Men and Violence in Asia and the Pacific. Medical Entomology and Zoology.113 indexed citations
6.
Lang, James, Jeff Hearn, Michael S. Kimmel, et al.. (2004). Ending gender based violence: a call for global action to involve men. UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol).16 indexed citations
7.
Greig, Alan, Michael S. Kimmel, & James Lang. (2000). Men masculinities and development: broadening our work towards gender equality.. Medical Entomology and Zoology.48 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.