Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by James K. Wight
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of James K. Wight's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James K. Wight with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James K. Wight more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James K. Wight. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James K. Wight. The network helps show where James K. Wight may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James K. Wight
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James K. Wight.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James K. Wight based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James K. Wight. James K. Wight is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Parra-Montesinos, Gustavo J., et al.. (2010). Earthquake-Resistant Coupling Beams without Diagonal Reinforcement. ACI Concrete International. 32(12). 36–40.10 indexed citations
2.
Wight, James K.. (2007). Changes to Expect in the 2008 Edition of the ACI Building Code [ACI 318-08]: Discussion is Invited by August 15, 2007. ACI Concrete International. 29(7). 49–53.
3.
Wight, James K., et al.. (2005). Concrete Q & A: Checking Punching Shear Strength by the ACI Code. ACI Concrete International. 27(11).4 indexed citations
4.
Wight, James K. & Gustavo J. Parra-Montesinos. (2003). STRUT-AND-TIE MODEL FOR DEEP BEAM DESIGN. ACI Concrete International. 25(5). 63–70.18 indexed citations
LaFave, James M. & James K. Wight. (1997). Behavior of reinforced concrete exterior wide beam-column-slab connections subjected to lateral earthquake loading.. Deep Blue (University of Michigan).7 indexed citations
Corley, W. Gene, et al.. (1996). 4 Concrete Parking Structures. Earthquake Spectra. 12(1S). 75–98.1 indexed citations
12.
LaFave, James M., Božidar Stojadinović, & James K. Wight. (1996). Lab Experiments For Reinforced Concrete Design Course. 18(12). 59–62.3 indexed citations
Wight, James K., Roman D. Hryciw, & Antoine E. Naaman. (1992). Field Investigation of Damage to Islamic Monuments Caused by the Egyptian Earthquake of October 12, 1992. Deep Blue (University of Michigan).1 indexed citations
15.
Wight, James K., et al.. (1990). Reinforced concrete structural walls with staggered opening configurations under reversed cyclic loading. Deep Blue (University of Michigan).12 indexed citations
16.
Naaman, Antoine E., et al.. (1987). SIFCON CONNECTIONS FOR SEISMIC RESISTANT FRAMES.. ACI Concrete International. 9(11). 34–39.15 indexed citations
Wight, James K., et al.. (1978). Delaying Shear Strength Decay In Reinforced Concrete Flexural Members Under Large Load Reversals.. Deep Blue (University of Michigan).18 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.