James Howe

677 citations
22 papers · 341 indexed · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

James Howe

20 papers receiving 325 citations

Peers

James Howe
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Artificial Intelligence 254
  • Hardware and Architecture 29
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 82
  • Information Systems 89
  • Global and Planetary Change 31
Replace Jianhua Yang with:
Jianhua Yang United States
Calvin Smith United States
Sébastien Jourdain United States
B. J. K. Evans Australia
Diego Cazorla Spain
José C. Cunha Portugal
Annalisa Bossi Italy
Ya Zhao China
Yujia Liu China
James Howe relative to Jianhua Yang United States Jianhua Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jianhua Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Howe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Howe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Howe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Howe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Howe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Howe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Howe. The network helps show where James Howe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Howe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Howe Line = papers co-authored together James Howe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201661
2 200742
3 201536
4 201836
5 201633
6 201821
7 201920
8 202120
9 201815
10 20199
11 20178
12 20168
13 20188
14 19986
15 20015
16 20215
17 20164
18 20172
19
Standard lattices in hardware.
20161
20
An Environment for "Sniffing" DCE-RPC Traffic
19931

About James Howe

James Howe is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Hardware and Architecture and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 341 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cryptography and Data Security (16 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (8 papers), Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic (7 papers), Cryptographic Implementations and Security (6 papers), Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption (5 papers), Embedded Systems Design Techniques (2 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (1 paper) and Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (254 citations), Hardware and Architecture (29 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (82 citations), Information Systems (89 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (31 citations). James Howe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Tim Güneysu, Francesco Regazzoni, Ayesha Khalid, Máire O׳Neill, Ciara Rafferty, Tobias Oder, Máire O’Neill, Anupam Chattopadhyay, Prasanna Ravi and Shivam Bhasin. Their work appears in journals such as IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems, Journal of Cryptographic Engineering, Progress in Planning, Regional Studies and ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact