Countries citing papers authored by James George Frazer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of James George Frazer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James George Frazer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James George Frazer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James George Frazer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James George Frazer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James George Frazer. The network helps show where James George Frazer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James George Frazer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James George Frazer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James George Frazer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James George Frazer. James George Frazer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Frazer, James George. (2019). Myths of the Origin of Fire. Medical Entomology and Zoology.3 indexed citations
2.
Douglas, Mary & James George Frazer. (2016). Judgments on James Frazer. Journal of Bioluminescence and Chemiluminescence. 12(4). 193–7.4 indexed citations
3.
Ovid & James George Frazer. (2015). Fastorum libri sex: The Fasti of Ovid.1 indexed citations
4.
Frazer, James George. (2013). Aftermath. Cambridge University Press eBooks.1 indexed citations
5.
Frazer, James George. (2012). Balder the Beautiful. Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Frazer, James George, et al.. (2010). Фольклор в Ветхом Завете.3 indexed citations
8.
Frazer, James George. (2007). La crocifissione di Cristo : seguito da La crocifissione di Aman di Edgar Wind.
9.
Frazer, James George. (2002). Bibliography and general index. Palgrave eBooks.1 indexed citations
10.
Frazer, James George & Robert Fraser. (1994). The golden bough : a study in magic and religion : a new abridgement from the second and third editions. Oxford University Press eBooks.27 indexed citations
11.
Baliunas, S. L., et al.. (1993). CAII H and K Variations of a Sample of Hybrid Stars - do Hybrids Pulsate. ASPC. 45. 300.1 indexed citations
12.
Frazer, James George. (1989). Der goldene Zweig : das Geheimnis von Glauben und Sitten der Völker.2 indexed citations
13.
Baliunas, S. L., Wendy D. Bennett, John W. Briggs, et al.. (1988). The Mount Wilson Observatory HK Project: The Continuing Analysis of Rotation and Stellar Magnetic Cycles. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 20. 994.1 indexed citations
Frazer, James George. (1981). El folklore en el Antiguo Testamento. Fondo de Cultura Económica eBooks. 18(6). 2–2.10 indexed citations
16.
Frazer, James George, et al.. (1981). Le roi magicien dans la société primitive . Tabou et les périls de l'âme.2 indexed citations
17.
Frazer, James George, et al.. (1981). Le rameau d'or.17 indexed citations
18.
Ovid, B.C. or A.D. & James George Frazer. (1971). Fastorum libri sex. G. Olms eBooks.
19.
Frazer, James George, et al.. (1968). Der goldene Zweig : eine Studie Über Magie und Religion.
20.
Dawson, Warren R. & James George Frazer. (1967). The Frazer lectures, 1922-1932, by divers hands.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.