Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Online analysis enhances use of NASA Earth science data
2007684 citationsJames G. Acker, Gregory LeptoukhEosprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by James G. Acker
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of James G. Acker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James G. Acker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James G. Acker more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James G. Acker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James G. Acker. The network helps show where James G. Acker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James G. Acker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James G. Acker.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James G. Acker based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James G. Acker. James G. Acker is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Acker, James G., et al.. (2007). Exploiting the Capabilities of NASA's Giovanni System for Oceanographic Education.1 indexed citations
9.
Acker, James G. & Gregory Leptoukh. (2007). Online analysis enhances use of NASA Earth science data. Eos. 88(2). 14–17.684 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Shen, Samuel S. P., et al.. (2006). Observing Increased Chlorophyll-a in Storm Wakes for the 2005 Atlantic Hurricane Season using 8-Day Data Products in Giovanni. AGU Spring Meeting Abstracts. 2007.3 indexed citations
11.
Shen, Samuel S. P., Hualan Rui, Zhong Liu, et al.. (2005). Giovanni: A System for Rapid Access, Visualization and Analysis of Earth Science Data Online.1 indexed citations
12.
Acker, James G., G. Leptoukh, Steven Kempler, et al.. (2004). Real Data and Rapid Results: Ocean Color Data Analysis with Giovanni (GES DISC Interactive Online Visualization and ANalysis Infrastructure). 2004.
Hooker, Stanford B., Elaine R. Firestone, James G. Acker, et al.. (1995). Volume 32, Level - 3 SeaWiFS Data Products: Spatial and Temporal Binning Algorithms.5 indexed citations
15.
Hooker, Stanford B., Elaine R. Firestone, James G. Acker, James L. Mueller, & R. W. Austin. (1995). Volume 25, Ocean Optics Protocols for SeaWiFS Validation, Revision 1.153 indexed citations
16.
Hooker, Stanford B., Elaine R. Firestone, & James G. Acker. (1994). Volume 21, The Heritage of SeaWiFS: A Retrospective on the CZCS NIMBUS Experiment Team (NET) Program.4 indexed citations
17.
Hooker, Stanford B., Elaine R. Firestone, James G. Acker, et al.. (1994). Volume 22, Prelaunch Acceptance Report for the SeaWiFS Radiometer.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.