James Forder

115 total papers · 884 total citations
34 papers, 369 citations indexed

About

James Forder is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics and Finance. According to data from OpenAlex, James Forder has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 369 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 23 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 12 papers in Finance. Recurrent topics in James Forder's work include Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (16 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (16 papers) and Economic Theory and Institutions (11 papers). James Forder is often cited by papers focused on Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (16 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (16 papers) and Economic Theory and Institutions (11 papers). James Forder collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. James Forder's co-authors include Roger E. Backhouse, Anand Menon and Stan Hurn and has published in prestigious journals such as European Economic Review, Public Choice and European Journal of Political Economy.

In The Last Decade

James Forder

28 papers receiving 254 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
James Forder 268 222 217 38 23 34 369
Zenon G. Kontolemis 286 1.1× 289 1.3× 204 0.9× 28 0.7× 14 0.6× 25 415
Kirsten Lommatzsch 294 1.1× 310 1.4× 156 0.7× 33 0.9× 16 0.7× 23 387
Victor Argy 306 1.1× 239 1.1× 212 1.0× 18 0.5× 16 0.7× 60 403
F. Gülçin Özkan 232 0.9× 266 1.2× 224 1.0× 47 1.2× 19 0.8× 31 413
Lester V. Chandler 207 0.8× 157 0.7× 171 0.8× 21 0.6× 23 1.0× 30 347
Franco Spinelli 239 0.9× 259 1.2× 115 0.5× 37 1.0× 8 0.3× 33 378
Robert Anderton 219 0.8× 221 1.0× 114 0.5× 25 0.7× 16 0.7× 38 425
Nicos Christodoulakis 178 0.7× 272 1.2× 105 0.5× 62 1.6× 34 1.5× 45 385
Alberto Botta 241 0.9× 228 1.0× 141 0.6× 26 0.7× 46 2.0× 39 359
Ana Gómez‐Loscos 228 0.9× 321 1.4× 146 0.7× 24 0.6× 11 0.5× 29 443

Countries citing papers authored by James Forder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Forder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Forder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Forder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Forder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Forder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Forder. The network helps show where James Forder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Forder

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Forder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Forder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Forder. James Forder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026