James F. Tull
- Geophysics top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Earth-Surface Processes
- Atmospheric Science
- Paleontology
- Co-authors
- Arild AndresenPaul A. MuellerLei LiChristopher S. Holm‐DenomaJ. L. WoodenJohn E. RepetskiBenjamin L. DavisFrank K. McKinney
- Topics
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis (22 papers)Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (18 papers)Geological formations and processes (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndiaSaudi Arabia
In The Last Decade
James F. Tull
35 papers receiving 260 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Geophysics 269
- Artificial Intelligence 174
- Earth-Surface Processes 34
- Atmospheric Science 30
- Paleontology 18
Countries citing papers authored by James F. Tull
This map shows the geographic impact of James F. Tull's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James F. Tull with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James F. Tull more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James F. Tull
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James F. Tull. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James F. Tull. The network helps show where James F. Tull may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James F. Tull
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James F. Tull. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James F. Tull based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James F. Tull. James F. Tull is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | Map-scale dextral folds in the footwall of a far traveled crystalline thrust sheet, Alabama-Georgia Appalachians | 1 |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | Age and tectonic setting of the Tysfjord gneiss granite, Efjord, North Norway | 22 |
| 17 | PROPOSED STRATIGRAPHIC LINKAGES BETWEEN THE TALLADEGA SLATE BELT AND THE APPALACHIAN MIOGEOCLINE -TECTONIC IMPLICATIONS | 2 |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | A FIELD GUIDE TO THE APPALACHIAN THRUST BELT IN ALABAMA | 3 |
| 20 | 15 |
About James F. Tull
James F. Tull is a scholar working on Geophysics, Earth-Surface Processes and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 36 papers that have together received 293 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geological and Geochemical Analysis (22 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (18 papers) and Geological formations and processes (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (269 citations), Artificial Intelligence (174 citations) and Earth-Surface Processes (34 citations). James F. Tull has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Arild Andresen, Paul A. Mueller, Lei Li, Christopher S. Holm‐Denoma, J. L. Wooden, John E. Repetski, Benjamin L. Davis, Frank K. McKinney, Anita G. Harris and David W. Farris. Their work appears in journals such as Geology, Geological Society of America Bulletin and American Journal of Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.