James F. Klemic
- Biomedical Engineering top 1%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering top 2%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Materials Chemistry top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Mark A. ReedEric SternDaniel B. Turner‐EvansDavid A. RoutenbergKathryn G. KlemicTarek M. FahmyDavid A. LaVanAndrew D. Hamilton
- Topics
- Nanowire Synthesis and Applications (8 papers)Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (4 papers)Graphene research and applications (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
James F. Klemic
23 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
- Biomedical Engineering 1.8k
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1.6k
- Molecular Biology 1.0k
- Materials Chemistry 850
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 487
Countries citing papers authored by James F. Klemic
This map shows the geographic impact of James F. Klemic's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James F. Klemic with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James F. Klemic more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James F. Klemic
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James F. Klemic. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James F. Klemic. The network helps show where James F. Klemic may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James F. Klemic
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James F. Klemic. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James F. Klemic based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James F. Klemic. James F. Klemic is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Programmable nanowire circuits for nanoprocessorsbreakdown → | 433 |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | Label-free immunodetection with CMOS-compatible semiconducting nanowiresbreakdown → | 1098 |
| 4 | 51 | |
| 5 | 27 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 150 | |
| 8 | 84 | |
| 9 | 54 | |
| 10 | 105 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 71 | |
| 13 | 158 | |
| 14 | 38 | |
| 15 | 56 | |
| 16 | 24 | |
| 17 | Analysis of yeast protein kinases using protein chipsbreakdown → | 612 |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 305 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About James F. Klemic
James F. Klemic is a scholar working on Bioengineering, Biomedical Engineering and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nanowire Synthesis and Applications (8 papers), Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (4 papers) and Graphene research and applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Bioengineering (395 citations), Biomedical Engineering (1.8k citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.6k citations). James F. Klemic has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Mark A. Reed, Eric Stern, Daniel B. Turner‐Evans, David A. Routenberg, Kathryn G. Klemic, Tarek M. Fahmy, David A. LaVan, Andrew D. Hamilton, Shamik Das and Charles M. Lieber. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Nature Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.