James F. Gibbs

721 total citations
30 papers, 604 citations indexed

About

James F. Gibbs is a scholar working on Geophysics, Artificial Intelligence and Civil and Structural Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, James F. Gibbs has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 604 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Geophysics, 24 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 5 papers in Civil and Structural Engineering. Recurrent topics in James F. Gibbs's work include Seismic Waves and Analysis (27 papers), Seismology and Earthquake Studies (24 papers) and Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques (18 papers). James F. Gibbs is often cited by papers focused on Seismic Waves and Analysis (27 papers), Seismology and Earthquake Studies (24 papers) and Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques (18 papers). James F. Gibbs collaborates with scholars based in United States. James F. Gibbs's co-authors include Roger D. Borcherdt, William B. Joyner, David M. Boore, Thomas E. Fumal, T. E. Fumal, John C. Tinsley, John H. Healy, C. B. Raleigh, David H. Harlow and Peter L. Ward and has published in prestigious journals such as Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Earthquake Spectra and Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World.

In The Last Decade

James F. Gibbs

30 papers receiving 463 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James F. Gibbs United States 13 500 333 96 66 48 30 604
Richard E. Warrick United States 12 598 1.2× 292 0.9× 118 1.2× 100 1.5× 31 0.6× 23 684
A.M. Rogers United States 13 466 0.9× 228 0.7× 64 0.7× 43 0.7× 38 0.8× 28 529
Toru IGARASHI Japan 3 573 1.1× 317 1.0× 58 0.6× 103 1.6× 67 1.4× 5 609
M. Meremonte United States 15 566 1.1× 355 1.1× 65 0.7× 37 0.6× 100 2.1× 25 658
Mitsuo Nogoshi Japan 4 594 1.2× 318 1.0× 68 0.7× 104 1.6× 67 1.4× 7 631
N. Theodoulidis Greece 14 499 1.0× 389 1.2× 54 0.6× 95 1.4× 44 0.9× 43 636
S. M. Richwalski Germany 9 618 1.2× 256 0.8× 76 0.8× 184 2.8× 41 0.9× 20 648
Fortunat Kind Switzerland 5 640 1.3× 289 0.9× 70 0.7× 155 2.3× 65 1.4× 5 681
Masayuki Takemura Japan 12 579 1.2× 324 1.0× 104 1.1× 52 0.8× 60 1.3× 74 675
B. Hernandez France 12 541 1.1× 353 1.1× 68 0.7× 33 0.5× 36 0.8× 20 695

Countries citing papers authored by James F. Gibbs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James F. Gibbs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James F. Gibbs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James F. Gibbs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James F. Gibbs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James F. Gibbs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James F. Gibbs. The network helps show where James F. Gibbs may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James F. Gibbs

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James F. Gibbs. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James F. Gibbs based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James F. Gibbs. James F. Gibbs is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Boore, David M., James F. Gibbs, & William B. Joyner. (2020). Damping Values Derived from Surface-Source, Downhole-Receiver Measurements at 22 Sites in the San Francisco Bay Area of Central California and the San Fernando Valley of Southern California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 111(4). 2158–2166. 9 indexed citations
2.
Gibbs, James F., John C. Tinsley, & David M. Boore. (2002). Borehole velocity measurements at five sites that recorded the Cape Mendocino, California earthquake of 25 April, 1992. Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World. 3 indexed citations
3.
Gibbs, James F., John C. Tinsley, & William B. Joyner. (1996). Seismic velocities and geological conditions at twelve sites subjected to strong ground motion in the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake. Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World. 16 indexed citations
5.
Gibbs, James F., et al.. (1994). Seismic velocities and geologic logs from boreholes at three downhole arrays in San Francisco, California. Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World. 6 indexed citations
7.
Gibbs, James F., et al.. (1990). Seismic velocities from borehole measurements at four locations along a fifty-kilometer section of the San Andreas fault near Parkfield, California. Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World. 5 indexed citations
8.
Gibbs, James F.. (1989). Near-surface P- and S-wave velocities from borehole measurements near Lake Hemet, California. Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World. 15 indexed citations
9.
Gibbs, James F., et al.. (1989). 4. Seismic Velocities and Attenuation from Borehole Measurements near the Parkfield Prediction Zone, Central California. Earthquake Spectra. 5(3). 513–537. 13 indexed citations
10.
Fumal, Thomas E., et al.. (1982). In-situ measurements of seismic velocity at 22 locations in the Los Angeles, California region. Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World. 14 indexed citations
11.
Fumal, T. E., et al.. (1982). In-situ measurements of seismic velocity at 10 strong motion accelerograph stations in central California. Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World. 12 indexed citations
12.
Gibbs, James F., et al.. (1980). In-situ measurements of seismic velocity at 27 locations in the Los Angeles, California region. Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World. 12 indexed citations
13.
Gibbs, James F., et al.. (1977). In-situ measurements of seismic velocities in the San Francisco Bay Region; part III. Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World. 7 indexed citations
14.
Borcherdt, Roger D. & James F. Gibbs. (1976). Effects of local geological conditions in the San Francisco Bay region on ground motions and the intensities of the 1906 earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 66(2). 467–500. 173 indexed citations
15.
Borcherdt, Roger D. & James F. Gibbs. (1975). Prediction of maximum earthquake intensities for the San Francisco Bay region. Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World. 2 indexed citations
16.
Ward, Peter L., et al.. (1974). Aftershocks of the Managua, Nicaragua, earthquake and the tectonic significance of the Tiscapa fault. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 64(4). 1017–1029. 31 indexed citations
17.
Gibbs, James F. & Roger D. Borcherdt. (1974). Effects of local geology on ground motion in the San Francisco Bay region, California: A continued study. Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World. 9 indexed citations
18.
Gibbs, James F., et al.. (1973). Seismicity in the Rangely, Colorado, area: 1962-1970. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 63(5). 1557–1570. 41 indexed citations
19.
Gibbs, James F., et al.. (1972). Earthquakes in the oil field at Rangely, Colorado. Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World. 5 indexed citations
20.
Gibbs, James F., et al.. (1971). A digitized map of seismic ground response of the San Francisco Bay region, California. Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026