Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Size Allometry: Size and Shape Variables with Characterizations of the Lognormal and Generalized Gamma Distributions
1970624 citationsJames E. MosimannJournal of the American Statistical Associationprofile →
Cultural expectations of thinness in women: An update
1992518 citationsClaire V. Wiseman, James J. Gray et al.profile →
Canonical and principal components of shape
1985394 citationsJ. N. Darroch, James E. MosimannBiometrikaprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by James E. Mosimann
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Mosimann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Mosimann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Mosimann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Mosimann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Mosimann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Mosimann. The network helps show where James E. Mosimann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James E. Mosimann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James E. Mosimann.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James E. Mosimann based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James E. Mosimann. James E. Mosimann is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kamel, Ismail A., Allen W. Cheever, Anwar M. Elwi, James E. Mosimann, & Ray Danner. (1977). Schistosoma Mansoni and S. Haematobium Infections in Egypt. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 26(4). 696–701.42 indexed citations
9.
Mosimann, James E. & Paul S. Martin. (1975). Simulating Overkill by Paleoindians. American Scientist. 63(3). 304–313.130 indexed citations
10.
Mosimann, James E.. (1970). Size Allometry: Size and Shape Variables with Characterizations of the Lognormal and Generalized Gamma Distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 65(330). 930–945.624 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Fritts, Harold C., et al.. (1969). A Revised Computer Program for Standardizing Tree-Ring Series. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona).118 indexed citations
Mosimann, James E.. (1956). Variation and relative growth in the plastral scutes of the turtle Kinosternon integrum Leconte. Deep Blue (University of Michigan).11 indexed citations
19.
Rabb, George B. & James E. Mosimann. (1955). The tadpole of Hyla robertsorum, with comments on the affinities of the species. Deep Blue (University of Michigan).1 indexed citations
20.
Mosimann, James E. & George B. Rabb. (1953). A new subspecies of the turtle Geoemyda rubida (Cope) from western Mexico. Deep Blue (University of Michigan).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.