Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
PM2.5 chemical source profiles for vehicle exhaust, vegetative burning, geological material, and coal burning in Northwestern Colorado during 1995
2001562 citationsJohn G. Watson, Judith C. Chow et al.Chemosphereprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by James E. Houck
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Houck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Houck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Houck more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Houck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Houck. The network helps show where James E. Houck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James E. Houck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James E. Houck.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James E. Houck based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James E. Houck. James E. Houck is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Houck, James E., et al.. (2010). A Recommended Procedure for Compiling Emission Inventory National, Regional and County Level Activity Data for the Residential Wood Combustion Source Category.
Houck, James E.. (2007). Global Warming Reduction Benefits of Manufactured Biowax-Fiber Fireplace Logs.1 indexed citations
5.
Houck, James E., et al.. (2005). Development of a Fireplace Baseline Particulate Emission Factor Database.1 indexed citations
6.
Watson, John G., Judith C. Chow, & James E. Houck. (2001). PM2.5 chemical source profiles for vehicle exhaust, vegetative burning, geological material, and coal burning in Northwestern Colorado during 1995. Chemosphere. 43(8). 1141–1151.562 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Houck, James E., et al.. (2000). Comparison of Air Emissions between Cordwood and Wax-Sawdust Firelogs Burned in Residential Fireplaces.5 indexed citations
8.
Houck, James E., et al.. (1999). Long - Term Performance of EPA-Certified Phase 2 Woodstoves, Klamath Falls and Portland, Oregon: 1998/1999.7 indexed citations
9.
Houck, James E., et al.. (1998). Residential wood combustion technology review: Volume 1. Final technical report, July 1997--July 1998. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).4 indexed citations
10.
Houck, James E., et al.. (1998). Air Emissions from Residential Heating: The Wood Heating Option Put into Environmental Perspective.15 indexed citations
Houck, James E., et al.. (1990). Effects of appliance type and operating variables on woodstove emissions. Volume 2. Appendices D-F. Final report, June 1987-May 1988. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).
13.
Houck, James E., et al.. (1989). Chemical source characterization of residential wood combustion emissions in Denver, Colorado; Bakersfield, California; and Mammoth Lakes, California.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.