James E. Hook

682 total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 526 citations indexed

About

James E. Hook is a scholar working on Oceanography, Paleontology and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, James E. Hook has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 526 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Oceanography, 3 papers in Paleontology and 3 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in James E. Hook's work include Marine Biology and Ecology Research (6 papers), Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (3 papers) and Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (3 papers). James E. Hook is often cited by papers focused on Marine Biology and Ecology Research (6 papers), Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (3 papers) and Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (3 papers). James E. Hook collaborates with scholars based in United States and Germany. James E. Hook's co-authors include Raymond Freeman-Lynde, Barbara Hecker, R.F. Commeau, C. K. Paull, William Corso, Christian Neumann, Elisabeth L. Sikes, Joseph R. Curray, Stjepko Golubić and Thérèse Le Campion-Alsumard and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Journal of Sedimentary Research and Marine Ecology.

In The Last Decade

James E. Hook

7 papers receiving 489 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Biological Communities at the Florida Escarpment Resemble Hydrothermal Vent Taxa

1984 460 citations C. K. Paull, Barbara Hecker et al. Science profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
James E. Hook United States	5	268	225	209	158	120	7	526
William Corso United States	4	226 0.8×	229 1.0×	184 0.9×	168 1.1×	102 0.8×	8	504
Raymond Freeman-Lynde United States	7	239 0.9×	238 1.1×	198 0.9×	211 1.3×	108 0.9×	9	585
SCM O'Hara United Kingdom	7	262 1.0×	284 1.3×	148 0.7×	120 0.8×	113 0.9×	9	470
C. Boot United Kingdom	7	124 0.5×	106 0.5×	219 1.0×	284 1.8×	66 0.6×	7	458
Greg Cowie United Kingdom	11	392 1.5×	119 0.5×	252 1.2×	145 0.9×	120 1.0×	15	546
Sonja Schulte Germany	9	309 1.2×	229 1.0×	332 1.6×	568 3.6×	43 0.4×	12	724
Robert Collier United States	7	343 1.3×	134 0.6×	219 1.0×	304 1.9×	66 0.6×	7	523
Naokazu Ahagon Japan	13	184 0.7×	320 1.4×	280 1.3×	520 3.3×	53 0.4×	25	628
Kenji Konishi Japan	17	180 0.7×	68 0.3×	269 1.3×	349 2.2×	100 0.8×	59	751
Joel B. Thompson United States	8	231 0.9×	82 0.4×	151 0.7×	212 1.3×	59 0.5×	8	539

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Hook

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Hook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Hook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Hook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Hook

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Hook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Hook. The network helps show where James E. Hook may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James E. Hook

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James E. Hook. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James E. Hook based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James E. Hook. James E. Hook is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Golubić, Stjepko, Jürgen Schneider, Thérèse Le Campion-Alsumard, et al.. (2019). Approaching microbial bioerosion. Facies. 65(3). 13 indexed citations

2.

Hook, James E. & Stjepko Golubić. (1993). Microbial Shell Destruction in Deep‐Sea Mussels, Florida Escarpment. Marine Ecology. 14(1). 81–89. 19 indexed citations

3.

Hook, James E. & Stjepko Golubić. (1992). Mussel Periostracum from Deep‐Sea Redox Communities as a Microbial Habitat: 3. Secondary Inhabitants. Marine Ecology. 13(2). 119–131. 3 indexed citations

4.

Hook, James E. & Stjepko Golubić. (1990). Mussel Periostracum from Deep‐Sea Redox Communities as a Microbial Habitat: 2. The Pit Borers. Marine Ecology. 11(3). 239–254. 8 indexed citations

5.

Hook, James E. & Stjepko Golubić. (1988). Mussel Periostracum from Deep‐Sea Redox Communities as a Microbial Habitat: The Scalloping Periostracum Borer. Marine Ecology. 9(4). 347–364. 4 indexed citations

6.

Hook, James E.. (1984). Micritic Cement in Microborings is Not Necessarily a Shallow-Water Indicator. Journal of Sedimentary Research. Vol. 54. 19 indexed citations

7.

Paull, C. K., Barbara Hecker, R.F. Commeau, et al.. (1984). Biological Communities at the Florida Escarpment Resemble Hydrothermal Vent Taxa. Science. 226(4677). 965–967. 460 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact