James D. Sunderhaus

1.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
15 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

James D. Sunderhaus is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pharmacology and Organic Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, James D. Sunderhaus has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Molecular Biology, 9 papers in Pharmacology and 8 papers in Organic Chemistry. Recurrent topics in James D. Sunderhaus's work include Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (8 papers), Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology (4 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (3 papers). James D. Sunderhaus is often cited by papers focused on Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (8 papers), Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology (4 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (3 papers). James D. Sunderhaus collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and France. James D. Sunderhaus's co-authors include Stephen F. Martin, Chris Dockendorff, Robert M. Williams, David H. Sherman, Timothy McAfoos, Jennifer M. Finefield, Sachiko Tsukamoto, Shengying Li, Hubert Lam and Gregory B. Dudley and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Nature Chemistry and Chemistry - A European Journal.

In The Last Decade

James D. Sunderhaus

15 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Hit Papers

Applications of Multicomponent Reactions to the Synthesis... 2009 2026 2014 2020 2009 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James D. Sunderhaus United States 13 1.1k 482 453 114 113 15 1.4k
Yoshihisa Kobayashi United States 23 841 0.7× 492 1.0× 401 0.9× 53 0.5× 221 2.0× 53 1.4k
Jennifer M. Finefield United States 16 487 0.4× 341 0.7× 517 1.1× 191 1.7× 194 1.7× 21 1.0k
Dattatraya H. Dethe India 22 1.2k 1.0× 270 0.6× 230 0.5× 93 0.8× 177 1.6× 85 1.4k
Carlos A. Guerrero United States 15 935 0.8× 373 0.8× 218 0.5× 144 1.3× 126 1.1× 45 1.2k
Alan W. Grubbs United States 10 504 0.4× 164 0.3× 283 0.6× 114 1.0× 123 1.1× 12 701
Wei‐Dong Z. Li China 20 747 0.7× 468 1.0× 183 0.4× 75 0.7× 142 1.3× 73 1.2k
Jianglong Zhu United States 22 1.4k 1.2× 791 1.6× 143 0.3× 80 0.7× 118 1.0× 42 1.5k
Michèle Bois‐Choussy France 24 1.5k 1.3× 704 1.5× 285 0.6× 93 0.8× 82 0.7× 65 1.8k
Atsuo Nakazaki Japan 24 1.4k 1.3× 424 0.9× 338 0.7× 115 1.0× 345 3.1× 110 1.8k
Kin-ichi Tadano Japan 21 1.4k 1.2× 390 0.8× 308 0.7× 67 0.6× 253 2.2× 64 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by James D. Sunderhaus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James D. Sunderhaus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James D. Sunderhaus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James D. Sunderhaus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James D. Sunderhaus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James D. Sunderhaus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James D. Sunderhaus. The network helps show where James D. Sunderhaus may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James D. Sunderhaus

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James D. Sunderhaus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James D. Sunderhaus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James D. Sunderhaus. James D. Sunderhaus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Dan, Qingyun, Sean A. Newmister, Amy E. Fraley, et al.. (2019). Fungal indole alkaloid biogenesis through evolution of a bifunctional reductase/Diels–Alderase. Nature Chemistry. 11(11). 972–980. 64 indexed citations
2.
Kato, Hikaru, Tetsuro Kawabata, James D. Sunderhaus, et al.. (2017). Enantioselective inhibitory abilities of enantiomers of notoamides against RANKL-induced formation of multinuclear osteoclasts. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 27(22). 4975–4978. 12 indexed citations
3.
Cheng, Bo, James D. Sunderhaus, & Stephen F. Martin. (2015). Applications of ring closing metathesis. Total synthesis of (±)-pseudotabersonine. Tetrahedron. 71(39). 7323–7331. 13 indexed citations
4.
Kato, Hikaru, Takashi Nakahara, Jennifer M. Finefield, et al.. (2014). Bioconversion of 6-epi-Notoamide T produces metabolites of unprecedented structures in a marine-derived Aspergillus sp.. Tetrahedron Letters. 56(1). 247–251. 17 indexed citations
5.
Sunderhaus, James D., Timothy McAfoos, Jennifer M. Finefield, et al.. (2012). Synthesis and Bioconversions of Notoamide T: A Biosynthetic Precursor to Stephacidin A and Notoamide B. Organic Letters. 15(1). 22–25. 35 indexed citations
6.
Li, Shengying, Krithika Srinivasan, Hong Tran, et al.. (2012). Comparative analysis of the biosynthetic systems for fungal bicyclo[2.2.2]diazaoctane indole alkaloids: the (+)/(−)-notoamide, paraherquamide and malbrancheamide pathways. MedChemComm. 3(8). 987–987. 58 indexed citations
7.
Li, Shengying, Jennifer M. Finefield, James D. Sunderhaus, et al.. (2012). Correction to “Biochemical Characterization of NotB as an FAD-Dependent Oxidase in the Biosynthesis of Notoamide Indole Alkaloids”. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 134(50). 20565–20565. 3 indexed citations
8.
Li, Shengying, Jennifer M. Finefield, James D. Sunderhaus, et al.. (2011). Biochemical Characterization of NotB as an FAD-Dependent Oxidase in the Biosynthesis of Notoamide Indole Alkaloids. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 134(2). 788–791. 110 indexed citations
9.
Sunderhaus, James D., David H. Sherman, & Robert M. Williams. (2011). Studies on the Biosynthesis of the Stephacidin and Notoamide Natural Products: A Stereochemical and Genetic Conundrum. Israel Journal of Chemistry. 51(3-4). 442–452. 27 indexed citations
10.
Cheng, Bo, James D. Sunderhaus, & Stephen F. Martin. (2010). Concise Total Synthesis of (±)-Pseudotabersonine via Double Ring-Closing Metathesis Strategy. Organic Letters. 12(16). 3622–3625. 35 indexed citations
11.
Ding, Yousong, Jeffrey R. de Wet, James D. Cavalcoli, et al.. (2010). Genome-Based Characterization of Two Prenylation Steps in the Assembly of the Stephacidin and Notoamide Anticancer Agents in a Marine-Derived Aspergillus sp.. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 132(36). 12733–12740. 110 indexed citations
12.
Sunderhaus, James D. & Stephen F. Martin. (2009). Applications of Multicomponent Reactions to the Synthesis of Diverse Heterocyclic Scaffolds. Chemistry - A European Journal. 15(6). 1300–1308. 655 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Sunderhaus, James D., Chris Dockendorff, & Stephen F. Martin. (2009). Synthesis of diverse heterocyclic scaffolds via tandem additions to imine derivatives and ring-forming reactions. Tetrahedron. 65(33). 6454–6469. 71 indexed citations
14.
Sunderhaus, James D., Chris Dockendorff, & Stephen F. Martin. (2007). Applications of Multicomponent Reactions for the Synthesis of Diverse Heterocyclic Scaffolds. Organic Letters. 9(21). 4223–4226. 155 indexed citations
15.
Sunderhaus, James D., Hubert Lam, & Gregory B. Dudley. (2003). Oxidation of Carbon−Silicon Bonds:  The Dramatic Advantage of Strained Siletanes. Organic Letters. 5(24). 4571–4573. 58 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026