James C. Jeng

5.5k total citations
100 papers, 2.7k citations indexed

About

James C. Jeng is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Rehabilitation and Emergency Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, James C. Jeng has authored 100 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 66 papers in Epidemiology, 34 papers in Rehabilitation and 23 papers in Emergency Medicine. Recurrent topics in James C. Jeng's work include Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (63 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (34 papers) and Disaster Response and Management (15 papers). James C. Jeng is often cited by papers focused on Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (63 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (34 papers) and Disaster Response and Management (15 papers). James C. Jeng collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. James C. Jeng's co-authors include Marion H. Jordan, Jeffrey W. Shupp, Amín D. Jaskille, Philip Fidler, Kathleen Jablonski, M. H. Jordan, Jeffrey R. Saffle, Sidney F. Miller, Dean S. Rosenthal and Richard J. Kagan and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Annals of Surgery and Critical Care Medicine.

In The Last Decade

James C. Jeng

94 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James C. Jeng United States 26 1.3k 916 388 385 353 100 2.7k
Tina L. Palmieri United States 37 2.8k 2.1× 1.3k 1.4× 1.1k 2.9× 971 2.5× 578 1.6× 251 4.4k
James H. Holmes United States 26 711 0.5× 647 0.7× 188 0.5× 549 1.4× 727 2.1× 92 2.3k
Eric A. Elster United States 40 951 0.7× 1.0k 1.1× 439 1.1× 717 1.9× 1.7k 4.8× 246 5.6k
Carl I. Schulman United States 34 690 0.5× 143 0.2× 468 1.2× 1.7k 4.4× 1.3k 3.8× 189 3.9k
Jim Hokanson United States 31 358 0.3× 699 0.8× 209 0.5× 57 0.1× 1.3k 3.8× 121 3.6k
Sidney F. Miller United States 21 567 0.4× 353 0.4× 281 0.7× 265 0.7× 323 0.9× 69 1.3k
Christopher E. White United States 27 644 0.5× 179 0.2× 269 0.7× 1.3k 3.4× 777 2.2× 74 3.1k
Sharmila Dissanaike United States 25 520 0.4× 240 0.3× 406 1.0× 409 1.1× 521 1.5× 126 1.9k
Luke P. H. Leenen Netherlands 31 933 0.7× 127 0.1× 491 1.3× 1.5k 3.9× 2.1k 5.9× 155 3.6k
Bernd Hartmann Germany 27 392 0.3× 422 0.5× 110 0.3× 79 0.2× 858 2.4× 81 2.0k

Countries citing papers authored by James C. Jeng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James C. Jeng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James C. Jeng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James C. Jeng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James C. Jeng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James C. Jeng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James C. Jeng. The network helps show where James C. Jeng may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James C. Jeng

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James C. Jeng. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James C. Jeng based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James C. Jeng. James C. Jeng is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Grigorian, Areg, James C. Jeng, Theresa L. Chin, et al.. (2024). Outcomes and predictors of unplanned intensive care unit admission for pediatric trauma patients. Surgery Open Science. 23. 30–34.
2.
Grigorian, Areg, et al.. (2024). Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Trauma Patients. Surgical Infections. 25(5). 370–375. 1 indexed citations
4.
Tadlock, Matthew D., et al.. (2023). War at Sea: Burn Care Challenges—Past, Present and Future. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(4). 605–630. 1 indexed citations
5.
Romanowski, Kathleen S, Victor Joe, James C. Jeng, et al.. (2020). Updating the Burn Center Referral Criteria: Results From the 2018 eDelphi Consensus Study. Journal of Burn Care & Research. 41(5). 1052–1062. 30 indexed citations
6.
Chen, Liang, Dagmar Amtmann, Nicole S. Gibran, et al.. (2018). Challenges to the Standardization of Trauma Data Collection in Burn, Traumatic Brain Injury, Spinal Cord Injury, and Other Trauma Populations: A Call for Common Data Elements for Acute and Longitudinal Trauma Databases. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 100(5). 891–898. 7 indexed citations
7.
Jeng, James C., Nicole S. Gibran, & Michael D. Peck. (2014). Burn Care in Disaster and Other Austere Settings. Surgical Clinics of North America. 94(4). 893–907. 26 indexed citations
8.
Shupp, Jeffrey W., et al.. (2011). Incidence of methemoglobinemia in patients receiving cerium nitrate and silver sulfadiazine for the treatment of burn wounds: A burn center's experience. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 19(2). 201–204. 12 indexed citations
9.
Tseng, Yuen‐Hsien, et al.. (2011). Statistical Approaches to Patent Translation for PatentMT- Experiments with Various Settings of Training Data. NTCIR. 2 indexed citations
10.
Shupp, Jeffrey W., Rūta Petraitienė, Amín D. Jaskille, et al.. (2011). Early serum (1→3)‐β‐D‐glucan levels in patients with burn injury. Mycoses. 55(3). 224–227. 10 indexed citations
11.
Shupp, Jeffrey W., et al.. (2011). The Results of a National Survey Regarding Nutritional Care of Obese Burn Patients. Journal of Burn Care & Research. 32(5). 561–565. 7 indexed citations
12.
Johnson, Laura S., et al.. (2010). Hospital Length of Stay—Does 1% TBSA Really Equal 1 Day?. Journal of Burn Care & Research. 32(1). 13–19. 56 indexed citations
13.
Shupp, Jeffrey W., James C. Jeng, John C. Pezzullo, et al.. (2010). Epidemiology of Bloodstream Infections in Burn-Injured Patients: A Review of the National Burn Repository. Journal of Burn Care & Research. 31(4). 521–528. 60 indexed citations
14.
Jaskille, Amín D., Jeffrey W. Shupp, Marion H. Jordan, & James C. Jeng. (2009). Critical Review of Burn Depth Assessment Techniques: Part I. Historical Review. Journal of Burn Care & Research. 30(6). 937–947. 108 indexed citations
15.
Jeng, James C.. (2008). From Qualitative Contemplation to Relational Database: One Approach to Harnessing the National Burn Repository. Journal of Burn Care & Research. 29(1). 267–268. 2 indexed citations
16.
Jeng, James C., et al.. (2008). Improved Markers for Burn Wound Perfusion in the Severely Burned Patient: The Role for Tissue and Gastric Pco2. Journal of Burn Care & Research. 29(1). 49–55. 7 indexed citations
17.
Jeng, James C., et al.. (2007). Is the Glass Really Half Empty? A Closer Look at the TBSA Data in the National Burn Repository. Journal of Burn Care & Research. 28(4). 542–543. 4 indexed citations
18.
Latenser, B.A., Sidney F. Miller, Palmer Q. Bessey, et al.. (2007). National Burn Repository 2006: A Ten-Year Review. Journal of Burn Care & Research. 28(5). 635–658. 89 indexed citations
19.
Jordan, Marion H., et al.. (2005). The Pentagon Attack of September 11, 2001: A Burn Center???s Experience. Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation. 26(2). 109–116. 33 indexed citations
20.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026