James C. Fraser

1.8k total citations
40 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

James C. Fraser is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Finance and Urban Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, James C. Fraser has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 13 papers in Finance and 11 papers in Urban Studies. Recurrent topics in James C. Fraser's work include Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (15 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (12 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (9 papers). James C. Fraser is often cited by papers focused on Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (15 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (12 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (9 papers). James C. Fraser collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. James C. Fraser's co-authors include Edward L. Kick, Joshua Theodore Bazuin, Robin Williams, Daniel H. de Vries, Deirdre Oakley, Jean‐Paul D. Addie, J. Patrick Williams, Laura A. McKinney, Amanda R. Carrico and Lawrence E. Band and has published in prestigious journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Landscape and Urban Planning and Urban Studies.

In The Last Decade

James C. Fraser

40 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James C. Fraser United States 20 674 282 202 177 158 40 1.2k
Wendy Stone Australia 19 610 0.9× 145 0.5× 239 1.2× 143 0.8× 212 1.3× 84 1.4k
Deborah G. Martin United States 22 1.0k 1.5× 606 2.1× 265 1.3× 221 1.2× 100 0.6× 52 2.1k
D. M. Smith Canada 6 608 0.9× 295 1.0× 119 0.6× 129 0.7× 166 1.1× 24 1.6k
Winifred Curran United States 13 484 0.7× 343 1.2× 92 0.5× 225 1.3× 96 0.6× 22 1.2k
Eric Pawson New Zealand 22 477 0.7× 197 0.7× 110 0.5× 113 0.6× 230 1.5× 81 1.7k
Aileen Stockdale United Kingdom 22 926 1.4× 421 1.5× 84 0.4× 130 0.7× 157 1.0× 56 1.8k
Tialda Haartsen Netherlands 23 857 1.3× 332 1.2× 56 0.3× 151 0.9× 127 0.8× 81 1.6k
J. Nicholas Entrikin United States 16 866 1.3× 335 1.2× 98 0.5× 94 0.5× 90 0.6× 39 1.9k
Anne Rademacher United States 13 436 0.6× 138 0.5× 124 0.6× 103 0.6× 135 0.9× 25 1.0k
Ruth Fincher Australia 26 1.4k 2.0× 619 2.2× 246 1.2× 333 1.9× 156 1.0× 84 2.4k

Countries citing papers authored by James C. Fraser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James C. Fraser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James C. Fraser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James C. Fraser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James C. Fraser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James C. Fraser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James C. Fraser. The network helps show where James C. Fraser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James C. Fraser

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James C. Fraser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James C. Fraser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James C. Fraser. James C. Fraser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fraser, James C., et al.. (2019). The Raced–Space of Gentrification: “Reverse Blockbusting,” Home Selling, and Neighborhood Remake in North Nashville. City and Community. 19(1). 223–244. 17 indexed citations
2.
Addie, Jean‐Paul D. & James C. Fraser. (2019). After Gentrification: Social Mix, Settler Colonialism, and Cruel Optimism in the Transformation of Neighbourhood Space. Antipode. 51(5). 1369–1394. 40 indexed citations
3.
Fraser, James C., Joshua Theodore Bazuin, Lawrence E. Band, & J. Morgan Grove. (2013). Covenants, cohesion, and community: The effects of neighborhood governance on lawn fertilization. Landscape and Urban Planning. 115. 30–38. 62 indexed citations
4.
Bazuin, Joshua Theodore & James C. Fraser. (2013). How the ACS gets it wrong: The story of the American Community Survey and a small, inner city neighborhood. Applied Geography. 45. 292–302. 49 indexed citations
5.
Fraser, James C., et al.. (2012). Crime Scene Examiners and Volume Crime Investigations: An Empirical Study of Perception and Practice. 3(2). 53–61. 38 indexed citations
6.
Vries, Daniel H. de & James C. Fraser. (2012). Citizenship Rights and Voluntary Decision Making in Post-Disaster U.S. Floodplain Buyout Mitigation Programs. International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters. 30(1). 1–33. 90 indexed citations
7.
Kick, Edward L., James C. Fraser, Gregory M. Fulkerson, Laura A. McKinney, & Daniel H. de Vries. (2011). Repetitive flood victims and acceptance of FEMA mitigation offers: an analysis with community–system policy implications. Disasters. 35(3). 510–539. 82 indexed citations
8.
Fraser, James C. & Robin Williams. (2009). The handbook of forensic science. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University). 99 indexed citations
9.
Fraser, James C. & Michael H. Nelson. (2008). Can Mixed‐Income Housing Ameliorate Concentrated Poverty? The Significance of a Geographically Informed Sense of Community. Geography Compass. 2(6). 2127–2144. 17 indexed citations
10.
Fraser, James C.. (2005). The Relevance of Human Geography for Studying Urban Disasters. Space and Culture. 9(1). 14–19. 5 indexed citations
11.
Fraser, James C.. (2004). Beyond Gentrification: Mobilizing Communities and Claiming Space. Urban Geography. 25(5). 437–457. 71 indexed citations
12.
Fraser, James C., et al.. (2004). The uses of knowledge in neighbourhood revitalization. Community Development Journal. 39(1). 4–12. 36 indexed citations
13.
Fraser, James C.. (2003). Delivery and evaluation of forensic science. Science & Justice. 43(4). 249–252. 1 indexed citations
14.
Fraser, James C., Edward L. Kick, & J. Patrick Williams. (2002). Neighborhood Revitalization and the Practice of Evaluation in the United States: Developing a Margin Research Perspective. City and Community. 1(2). 223–244. 10 indexed citations
15.
Fraser, James C., et al.. (2000). Job Satisfaction in Higher Education: Examining Gender in Professional Work Settings. Sociological Inquiry. 70(2). 172–178. 25 indexed citations
16.
Fraser, James C. & Edward L. Kick. (2000). The Interpretive Repertoires of Whites on Race-Targeted Policies: Claims Making of Reverse Discrimination. Sociological Perspectives. 43(1). 13–28. 41 indexed citations
17.
Lewis, R. M., G. C. Emmans, G. Simm, et al.. (1999). The consequences of index selection on carcass composition in Suffolk sheep. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science. 1999. 46–46. 1 indexed citations
18.
Fraser, James C., et al.. (1998). A Research Note on Post-Dating Relationships: The Social Embeddedness of Redefining Romantic Couplings. Sociological Perspectives. 41(1). 209–219. 19 indexed citations
19.
Fraser, James C.. (1997). Developing Definitions of an Adoptee-Birthmother Reunion Relationship. Marriage & Family Review. 25(1-2). 67–78. 4 indexed citations
20.
Fraser, James C., et al.. (1974). An extrinsic silicon charge coupled device for detecting infrared radiation. 442–445. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Wendy Stone Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Deborah G. Martin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by D. M. Smith Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Winifred Curran Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Eric Pawson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Aileen Stockdale Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tialda Haartsen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. Nicholas Entrikin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anne Rademacher Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ruth Fincher
Rankless by CCL
2026