James Blackburn

2.1k citations
38 papers · 1.6k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

James Blackburn

37 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

James Blackburn
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 920
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 127
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 469
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 150
  • Social Psychology 295
Replace Nan Sui with:
Nan Sui China
Antonio Alcaro Italy
Federico Sanabria United States
Sigmund Hsiao United States
Arthur Tomie United States
Merle E. Meyer United States
Gary L. Brammer United States
Inga Gritsenko Israel
William F. Caul United States
Maria A. Morgan United States
James Blackburn relative to Nan Sui China Nan Sui's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Nan Sui · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Blackburn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Blackburn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Blackburn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Blackburn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Blackburn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Blackburn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Blackburn. The network helps show where James Blackburn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Blackburn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Blackburn Line = papers co-authored together James Blackburn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992332
2 1989164
3 1989135
4 1987127
5 1987107
6 199398
7 199675
8 200174
9 200070
10 198666
11 202147
12 198842
13 200128
14 200227
15 198925
16 199023
17 199720
18 198820
19 198919
20 198917

About James Blackburn

James Blackburn is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Social Psychology and Surgery, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (9 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (5 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (4 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (4 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (4 papers) and Nausea and vomiting management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (920 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (127 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (469 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (150 citations) and Social Psychology (295 citations). James Blackburn has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Anthony G. Phillips, Hans C. Fibiger, James G. Pfaus, Alexander Jakubovič, Charles D. Blaha, Sherry H. Stewart, Raymond M. Klein, C. Andrew Chapman, John S. Yeomans and W. Jake Jacobs. Their work appears in journals such as Behavioral Neuroscience, Behavioural Brain Research, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, Life Sciences and Clinical Endocrinology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact