Jakob Gath

1.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
10 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Jakob Gath is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Jakob Gath has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 5 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 3 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Jakob Gath's work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (6 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (5 papers) and Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (2 papers). Jakob Gath is often cited by papers focused on Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (6 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (5 papers) and Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (2 papers). Jakob Gath collaborates with scholars based in Denmark, Switzerland and Greece. Jakob Gath's co-authors include Kristian S. Thygesen, Karsten W. Jacobsen, Mikkel Strange, Thorsten Deilmann, Jens Jørgen Mortensen, Morten N. Gjerding, Mohnish Pandey, Nicki F. Hinsche, Thomas Olsen and Peter Mahler Larsen and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical Review B and Journal of High Energy Physics.

In The Last Decade

Jakob Gath

10 papers receiving 994 citations

Hit Papers

The Computational 2D Materials Database: high-throughput ... 2018 2026 2020 2023 2018 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jakob Gath Denmark 9 835 314 165 97 90 10 1.0k
S. Azevedo Brazil 20 1.4k 1.6× 267 0.9× 382 2.3× 87 0.9× 78 0.9× 125 1.7k
Nguyen Van Hieu Vietnam 16 524 0.6× 247 0.8× 132 0.8× 47 0.5× 50 0.6× 58 759
Jan Behrends United Kingdom 12 287 0.3× 152 0.5× 320 1.9× 82 0.8× 48 0.5× 19 638
Daniel T. Larson United States 14 525 0.6× 266 0.8× 126 0.8× 97 1.0× 42 0.5× 30 844
Nabhanila Nandi Germany 6 298 0.4× 99 0.3× 283 1.7× 127 1.3× 39 0.4× 10 619
Walter Escoffier France 16 741 0.9× 444 1.4× 467 2.8× 99 1.0× 15 0.2× 46 1.1k
Yin‐Zhong Wu China 13 396 0.5× 173 0.6× 163 1.0× 190 2.0× 35 0.4× 60 584
J. Söllner Germany 12 216 0.3× 252 0.8× 296 1.8× 35 0.4× 39 0.4× 48 527
Bart Verberck Belgium 15 882 1.1× 196 0.6× 235 1.4× 79 0.8× 28 0.3× 64 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Jakob Gath

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jakob Gath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jakob Gath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jakob Gath more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jakob Gath

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jakob Gath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jakob Gath. The network helps show where Jakob Gath may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jakob Gath

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jakob Gath. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jakob Gath based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jakob Gath. Jakob Gath is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Strange, Mikkel, Mohnish Pandey, Thorsten Deilmann, et al.. (2019). Reply to comment on ‘The Computational 2D Materials Database: high-throughput modeling and discovery of atomically thin crystals’. 2D Materials. 6(4). 48002–48002. 13 indexed citations
2.
Gath, Jakob & M. Wiesenberger. (2019). Consistency in drift-ordered fluid equations. Physics of Plasmas. 26(3). 5 indexed citations
3.
Strange, Mikkel, Mohnish Pandey, Thorsten Deilmann, et al.. (2018). The Computational 2D Materials Database: high-throughput modeling and discovery of atomically thin crystals. 2D Materials. 5(4). 42002–42002. 875 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Armas, Jay, et al.. (2018). Dissipative hydrodynamics with higher-form symmetry. Durham Research Online (Durham University). 17 indexed citations
5.
Armas, Jay, et al.. (2016). Forced fluid dynamics from blackfolds in general supergravity backgrounds. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2016(10). 14 indexed citations
6.
Gath, Jakob, Ayan Mukhopadhyay, Anastasios C. Petkou, P. Marios Petropoulos, & Κωνσταντίνος Σιάμπος. (2015). Petrov classification and holographic reconstruction of spacetime. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2015(9). 15 indexed citations
7.
Gath, Jakob, et al.. (2014). Viscous asymptotically flat Reissner-Nordström black branes. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2014(3). 9 indexed citations
8.
Armas, Jay, Jakob Gath, & Niels A. Obers. (2013). Electroelasticity of charged black branes. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2013(10). 12 indexed citations
9.
Armas, Jay, Jakob Gath, & Niels A. Obers. (2012). Black Branes as Piezoelectrics. Physical Review Letters. 109(24). 241101–241101. 17 indexed citations
10.
Vanin, Marco, Jakob Gath, Kristian S. Thygesen, & Karsten W. Jacobsen. (2010). First-principles calculations of graphene nanoribbons in gaseous environments: Structural and electronic properties. Physical Review B. 82(19). 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026