Jake Chandler

484 total citations
17 papers, 298 citations indexed

About

Jake Chandler is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy and History and Philosophy of Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Jake Chandler has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 298 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 7 papers in Philosophy and 3 papers in History and Philosophy of Science. Recurrent topics in Jake Chandler's work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (8 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers) and Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (5 papers). Jake Chandler is often cited by papers focused on Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (8 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers) and Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (5 papers). Jake Chandler collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Belgium. Jake Chandler's co-authors include Ryan J. Winston, William F. Hunt, David Brown, Richard Booth and Victoria S. Harrison and has published in prestigious journals such as Artificial Intelligence, Ecological Engineering and Synthese.

In The Last Decade

Jake Chandler

17 papers receiving 284 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jake Chandler Australia 7 113 86 69 66 43 17 298
Yunpeng Zhao China 10 50 0.4× 87 1.0× 81 1.2× 57 1.3× 34 532
Robert E. Tucker United States 8 6 0.1× 34 0.4× 10 0.1× 20 0.3× 8 0.2× 35 240
Jihui Tu China 11 26 0.2× 33 0.4× 44 0.7× 47 1.1× 34 335
Boyu Chen China 10 7 0.1× 24 0.3× 13 0.2× 21 0.5× 39 322
Audre Arlene Anthony 5 30 0.3× 21 0.2× 30 0.5× 9 0.2× 10 249
Huang Sheng China 10 14 0.1× 52 0.6× 72 1.1× 17 0.4× 34 297
Guoli Yang China 10 5 0.0× 33 0.4× 33 0.5× 20 0.5× 34 293
Rebecca J. Parsons United States 9 9 0.1× 91 1.1× 9 0.1× 8 0.1× 7 0.2× 21 366
Bryson Brown Canada 9 3 0.0× 123 1.4× 53 0.8× 41 0.6× 2 0.0× 28 326

Countries citing papers authored by Jake Chandler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jake Chandler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jake Chandler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jake Chandler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jake Chandler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jake Chandler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jake Chandler. The network helps show where Jake Chandler may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jake Chandler

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jake Chandler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jake Chandler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jake Chandler. Jake Chandler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Chandler, Jake & Richard Booth. (2022). Elementary Belief Revision Operators. Journal of Philosophical Logic. 52(1). 267–311. 1 indexed citations
2.
Booth, Richard & Jake Chandler. (2020). On strengthening the logic of iterated belief revision: Proper ordinal interval operators. Artificial Intelligence. 285. 103289–103289. 4 indexed citations
3.
Booth, Richard & Jake Chandler. (2019). From iterated revision to iterated contraction: Extending the Harper Identity. Artificial Intelligence. 277. 103171–103171. 3 indexed citations
4.
Booth, Richard & Jake Chandler. (2016). Extending the harper identity to iterated belief change. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University). 987–993. 3 indexed citations
5.
Chandler, Jake. (2016). Preservation, Commutativity and Modus Ponens: Two Recent Triviality Results. Mind. 126(502). 579–602. 2 indexed citations
6.
Booth, Richard & Jake Chandler. (2016). The Irreducibility of Iterated to Single Revision. Journal of Philosophical Logic. 46(4). 405–418. 5 indexed citations
7.
Chandler, Jake, et al.. (2016). Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI). 53 indexed citations
8.
Chandler, Jake. (2014). Subjective Probabilities Need Not be Sharp. Erkenntnis. 79(6). 1273–1286. 17 indexed citations
9.
Winston, Ryan J., et al.. (2013). Evaluation of floating treatment wetlands as retrofits to existing stormwater retention ponds. Ecological Engineering. 54. 254–265. 144 indexed citations
10.
Chandler, Jake. (2012). Defeat reconsidered. Analysis. 73(1). 49–51. 4 indexed citations
11.
Chandler, Jake. (2012). Acceptance, Aggregation and Scoring Rules. Erkenntnis. 78(1). 201–217. 6 indexed citations
12.
Harrison, Victoria S. & Jake Chandler. (2012). Probability in the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press eBooks. 13 indexed citations
13.
Chandler, Jake. (2012). Transmission Failure, AGM Style. Erkenntnis. 78(2). 383–398. 6 indexed citations
14.
Chandler, Jake. (2010). The Lottery Paradox Generalized?. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 61(3). 667–679. 13 indexed citations
15.
Chandler, Jake. (2010). Contrastive confirmation: some competing accounts. Synthese. 190(1). 129–138. 8 indexed citations
16.
Chandler, Jake. (2009). The transmission of support: a Bayesian re-analysis. Synthese. 176(3). 333–343. 11 indexed citations
17.
Chandler, Jake. (2007). Solving the Tacking Problem with Contrast Classes. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 58(3). 489–502. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026