Jacob Ferguson

600 total citations
9 papers, 360 citations indexed

About

Jacob Ferguson is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Jacob Ferguson has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 360 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in General Health Professions, 2 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 2 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Jacob Ferguson's work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (2 papers) and Healthcare cost, quality, practices (2 papers). Jacob Ferguson is often cited by papers focused on Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (2 papers) and Healthcare cost, quality, practices (2 papers). Jacob Ferguson collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Ireland. Jacob Ferguson's co-authors include Kaveh G Shojania, Juan Pablo Díaz-Martínez, Lisha Lo, Jeremy Grimshaw, George Tomlinson, Janice L. Kwan, Hanna R. Goldberg, Peter C. Austin, Danielle Martin and Joshua Tepper and has published in prestigious journals such as Molecular and Cellular Biology, BMJ and Journal of the American Ceramic Society.

In The Last Decade

Jacob Ferguson

8 papers receiving 351 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jacob Ferguson Canada 7 115 91 56 55 44 9 360
Mahmood Basil A. Al‐Rawi Saudi Arabia 12 39 0.3× 23 0.3× 6 0.1× 72 1.3× 28 0.6× 47 334
Tsai‐Ling Liu United States 12 122 1.1× 21 0.2× 27 0.5× 68 1.2× 116 2.6× 28 466
Heather A. Heaton United States 12 118 1.0× 147 1.6× 44 0.8× 84 1.5× 20 0.5× 52 443
Joseph P. Parker United States 14 71 0.6× 26 0.3× 82 1.5× 11 0.2× 54 1.2× 24 566
César Vaca Spain 3 179 1.6× 16 0.2× 26 0.5× 179 3.3× 36 0.8× 5 376
Sam Campbell Canada 12 103 0.9× 25 0.3× 86 1.5× 33 0.6× 56 1.3× 37 529
Peter Basch United States 8 147 1.3× 139 1.5× 67 1.2× 110 2.0× 41 0.9× 17 453
Rebecca Lake Australia 9 92 0.8× 36 0.4× 21 0.4× 63 1.1× 60 1.4× 23 417
Elizabeth Lindemann United States 10 107 0.9× 40 0.4× 13 0.2× 116 2.1× 41 0.9× 26 394

Countries citing papers authored by Jacob Ferguson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jacob Ferguson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacob Ferguson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacob Ferguson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jacob Ferguson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacob Ferguson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacob Ferguson. The network helps show where Jacob Ferguson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jacob Ferguson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jacob Ferguson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jacob Ferguson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jacob Ferguson. Jacob Ferguson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Ferguson, Jacob, et al.. (2023). Fine and strengthened Li7La3Zr0.5Nb0.5Ta0.5Hf0.5O12 high-entropy Li-garnet: A comparison study with Ta doped Li-garnet. Ceramics International. 49(21). 33981–33990. 8 indexed citations
2.
O’Neill, Braden, et al.. (2023). Evaluating the Supporting Evidence of Medical Cannabis Claims Made on Clinic Websites: Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 25. e45550–e45550. 2 indexed citations
3.
O’Neill, Braden, Sumeet Kalia, Susan Hum, et al.. (2022). Socioeconomic and immigration status and COVID-19 testing in Toronto, Ontario: retrospective cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 22(1). 1067–1067. 7 indexed citations
4.
Ferguson, Jacob, et al.. (2022). Processing and characterization of an Li 7 La 3 Zr 0.5 Nb 0.5 Ta 0.5 Hf 0.5 O 12 high‐entropy Li–garnet electrolyte. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 105(10). 6175–6183. 39 indexed citations
5.
Lim, Michelle Gek Liang, Rachel Creighton, Jacob Ferguson, et al.. (2020). Janus Kinase Mutations in Mice Lacking PU.1 and Spi-B Drive B Cell Leukemia through Reactive Oxygen Species-Induced DNA Damage. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 40(18). 8 indexed citations
6.
Kwan, Janice L., Lisha Lo, Jacob Ferguson, et al.. (2020). Computerised clinical decision support systems and absolute improvements in care: meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. BMJ. 370. m3216–m3216. 250 indexed citations
7.
Bouck, Zachary, Andrew Calzavara, Noah Ivers, et al.. (2020). Association of Low-Value Testing With Subsequent Health Care Use and Clinical Outcomes Among Low-risk Primary Care Outpatients Undergoing an Annual Health Examination. JAMA Internal Medicine. 180(7). 973–973. 25 indexed citations
8.
Bouck, Zachary, Jacob Ferguson, Noah Ivers, et al.. (2018). Physician Characteristics Associated With Ordering 4 Low-Value Screening Tests in Primary Care. JAMA Network Open. 1(6). e183506–e183506. 21 indexed citations
9.
Ferguson, Jacob, et al.. (1987). How does sample size affect the reproducibility of a clinical prediction rule. Clinical research. 35(3). 344.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026