Jacob Carey

668 total citations
10 papers, 63 citations indexed

About

Jacob Carey is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Jacob Carey has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 63 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Cancer Research, 4 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 3 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Jacob Carey's work include Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (7 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (4 papers) and Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers). Jacob Carey is often cited by papers focused on Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (7 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (4 papers) and Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers). Jacob Carey collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Denmark. Jacob Carey's co-authors include Daria A. Gaykalova, Theresa Guo, Genevieve Stein-O’Brien, Michael Considine, Thomas D. Sherman, Emily Flam, Luigi Marchionni, Ronald D.G. McKay, Michael F. Ochs and Robert B. Scharpf and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Bioinformatics and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Jacob Carey

10 papers receiving 63 citations

Peers

Jacob Carey

MB

CR

ONCOL

GENET

PRM

Jule Harbig Germany

Christopher J. Yoon United States

Mirjam Blattner-Johnson Germany

Sebastian Vaughan United Kingdom

Celeste Leigh Pearce Australia

Natalya Dyakova United States

Liselot Mus Belgium

Dan A. Landau United States

Eunjung A. Lee United States

Catalina Anghel Canada

Jule Harbig Germany

Jacob Carey

107 ×2.8

MB

23 ×1.0

CR

17 ×1.3

ONCOL

12 ×0.9

GENET

8 ×1.0

PRM

Citations per year, relative to Jacob Carey Jacob Carey (= 1×) peers Jule Harbig

Countries citing papers authored by Jacob Carey

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jacob Carey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacob Carey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacob Carey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jacob Carey

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacob Carey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacob Carey. The network helps show where Jacob Carey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jacob Carey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jacob Carey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jacob Carey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jacob Carey. Jacob Carey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Mazzone, Peter J., Kwok‐Kin Wong, Jun-Chieh J. Tsay, et al.. (2023). Abstract 5766: Prospective evaluation of cell-free DNA fragmentomes for lung cancer detection. Cancer Research. 83(7_Supplement). 5766–5766. 2 indexed citations

2.

Leal, Alessandro, Dimitrios Mathios, Jakob Sidenius Johansen, et al.. (2023). Cell-Free DNA Fragmentomes in the Diagnostic Evaluation of Patients With Symptoms Suggestive of Lung Cancer. CHEST Journal. 164(4). 1019–1027. 9 indexed citations

3.

Erve, Iris van ’t, Keith Lumbard, L. Rinaldi, et al.. (2023). Abstract 5714: Cell-free DNA fragmentation profiling for monitoring therapeutic response in metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer Research. 83(7_Supplement). 5714–5714. 2 indexed citations

4.

Skidmore, Zachary L., Iris van ’t Erve, Keith Lumbard, et al.. (2023). Cell-free DNA fragmentation profiling for therapeutic response monitoring in metastatic colorectal cancer.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 41(16_suppl). e15664–e15664. 4 indexed citations

5.

Lumbard, Keith, Laurel A. Keefer, Jacob Carey, et al.. (2022). Abstract 2224: DELFI as a real-time treatment response assessment for patients with cancer. Cancer Research. 82(12_Supplement). 2224–2224. 1 indexed citations

6.

Carey, Jacob, Siân Jones, Alessandro Leal, et al.. (2021). Genome-wide cfDNA fragmentation in patients with cancer and other diseases.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 39(15_suppl). 3136–3136. 1 indexed citations

7.

Stein-O’Brien, Genevieve, Jacob Carey, Michael Considine, et al.. (2017). PatternMarkers & GWCoGAPS for novel data-driven biomarkers via whole transcriptome NMF. Bioinformatics. 33(12). 1892–1894. 25 indexed citations

8.

Li, Man, Jacob Carey, Stephen Cristiano, et al.. (2017). Genome-Wide Association of Copy Number Polymorphisms and Kidney Function. PLoS ONE. 12(1). e0170815–e0170815. 4 indexed citations

9.

Fertig, Elana J., Hiroyuki Ozawa, Manjusha Thakar, et al.. (2016). CoGAPS matrix factorization algorithm identifies transcriptional changes in AP-2alpha target genes in feedback from therapeutic inhibition of the EGFR network. Oncotarget. 7(45). 73845–73864. 8 indexed citations

10.

Fu, Jack, Terri H. Beaty, Alan F. Scott, et al.. (2016). Whole exome association of rare deletions in multiplex oral cleft families. Genetic Epidemiology. 41(1). 61–69. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact