Jackie Chandler

2.9k total citations
10 papers, 509 citations indexed

About

Jackie Chandler is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. According to data from OpenAlex, Jackie Chandler has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 509 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in General Health Professions, 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 2 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. Recurrent topics in Jackie Chandler's work include Health Policy Implementation Science (5 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (3 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers). Jackie Chandler is often cited by papers focused on Health Policy Implementation Science (5 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (3 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers). Jackie Chandler collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Norway and South Africa. Jackie Chandler's co-authors include Sally Hopewell, Claire Hawkes, Kate Seers, L. Strunin, Jo Rycroft‐Malone, Ian Bullock, Nicola Crichton, Claire Allen, Jane Noyes and Maggie Hendry and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, BMC Medical Research Methodology and Implementation Science.

In The Last Decade

Jackie Chandler

10 papers receiving 496 citations

Peers

Jackie Chandler

GHP

PHEOH

EE

PPCH

SPU

Laura Cullen United States

Eva Draborg Denmark

Christine Chang United States

Alan J. Card United Kingdom

Helga E. Breimaier Austria

Anne Brice United Kingdom

Elizabeth J. Dogherty Canada

Tricia Tooman United Kingdom

Zoë Skea United Kingdom

Curtis A. Olson United States

Laura Cullen United States

Jackie Chandler

566 ×1.9

GHP

175 ×1.7

PHEOH

49 ×0.8

EE

78 ×1.9

PPCH

56 ×1.4

SPU

Citations per year, relative to Jackie Chandler Jackie Chandler (= 1×) peers Laura Cullen

Countries citing papers authored by Jackie Chandler

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jackie Chandler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jackie Chandler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jackie Chandler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jackie Chandler

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jackie Chandler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jackie Chandler. The network helps show where Jackie Chandler may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jackie Chandler

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jackie Chandler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jackie Chandler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jackie Chandler. Jackie Chandler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Lewin, Simon, Maggie Hendry, Jackie Chandler, et al.. (2017). Assessing the complexity of interventions within systematic reviews: development, content and use of a new tool (iCAT_SR). BMC Medical Research Methodology. 17(1). 76–76. 88 indexed citations

2.

Lewin, Simon, Maggie Hendry, Jackie Chandler, et al.. (2017). Guidance for using the iCAT_SR: Intervention Complexity Assessment Tool for Systematic Reviews. Lirias (KU Leuven). 6 indexed citations

3.

Noyes, Jane, Maggie Hendry, Andrew Booth, et al.. (2016). Current use was established and Cochrane guidance on selection of social theories for systematic reviews of complex interventions was developed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 75. 78–92. 42 indexed citations

4.

Noyes, Jane, Maggie Hendry, Simon Lewin, et al.. (2016). Qualitative “trial-sibling” studies and “unrelated” qualitative studies contributed to complex intervention reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 74. 133–143. 19 indexed citations

5.

Noyes, Jane, Andrew Booth, Simon Lewin, et al.. (2015). Guidance for review authors on choice and use of social theory in complex intervention reviews. 1 indexed citations

6.

Noyes, Jane, et al.. (2015). Exploring complexity in systematic reviews of complex interventions. 73–80. 3 indexed citations

7.

Rycroft‐Malone, Jo, Kate Seers, Jackie Chandler, et al.. (2013). The role of evidence, context, and facilitation in an implementation trial: implications for the development of the PARIHS framework. Implementation Science. 8(1). 28–28. 220 indexed citations

8.

Chandler, Jackie & Sally Hopewell. (2013). Cochrane methods - twenty years experience in developing systematic review methods. Systematic Reviews. 2(1). 76–76. 78 indexed citations

9.

Rycroft‐Malone, Jo, Kate Seers, Nicola Crichton, et al.. (2012). A pragmatic cluster randomised trial evaluating three implementation interventions. Implementation Science. 7(1). 80–80. 48 indexed citations

10.

Chandler, Jackie, et al.. (1997). Tabbner's Nursing Care: Theory and Practice. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact