Jack C. Taylor

1.4k citations
12 papers · 279 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Jack C. Taylor

8 papers receiving 276 citations

Peers

Jack C. Taylor
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Cell Biology 101
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 64
  • Biological Psychiatry 7
  • Clinical Psychology 56
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 34
Replace Oleg A. Yakovlev with:
Oleg A. Yakovlev Russia
Frederike Winkel Finland
Vesna Lazarevic Sweden
Ingeborg Winge Norway
Ken H. Tachiki United States
Yong Kee Choi United States
Ciarán Martin Fitzpatrick Denmark
Marı́a Ester Celis Argentina
Erik T. Alpyshov Russia
Han Chow Chua Denmark
Jack C. Taylor relative to Oleg A. Yakovlev Russia Oleg A. Yakovlev's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Oleg A. Yakovlev · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack C. Taylor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack C. Taylor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack C. Taylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack C. Taylor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack C. Taylor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack C. Taylor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack C. Taylor. The network helps show where Jack C. Taylor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jack C. Taylor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack C. Taylor Line = papers co-authored together Jack C. Taylor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2016120
2 202064
3 201934
4
Digital Cognitive Assessments for Dementia: Digital assessments may enhance the efficiency of evaluations in neurology and other clinics.
202030
5 202120
6 20245
7 20215
8 20231
9 20230
10 20230
11 20250
12 20240

About Jack C. Taylor

Jack C. Taylor is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Molecular Biology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 279 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (4 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (2 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (1 paper), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (1 paper) and Delphi Technique in Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (101 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (64 citations), Biological Psychiatry (7 citations), Clinical Psychology (56 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (34 citations). Jack C. Taylor has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David Kokel, Michael J. Keiser, Leo Gendelev, Matthew N. McCarroll, Adam L. Boxer, Adam M. Staffaroni, Randall T. Peterson, Giancarlo N. Bruni, Douglas Myers-Turnbull and Andrew J. Rennekamp. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, Nature Communications, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact