Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Guelph PIXE software package
1989907 citationsJ.A. Maxwell et al.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atomsprofile →
The Guelph PIXE software package II
1995553 citationsJ.A. Maxwell, W.J. Teesdale et al.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atomsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of J.A. Maxwell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.A. Maxwell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.A. Maxwell more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.A. Maxwell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.A. Maxwell. The network helps show where J.A. Maxwell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J.A. Maxwell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J.A. Maxwell.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J.A. Maxwell based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J.A. Maxwell. J.A. Maxwell is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Heirwegh, Christopher M., et al.. (2021). The Guelph PIXE Software Package V. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 499. 77–88.23 indexed citations
Halden, N. M., et al.. (1993). Chemical characterization of oscillatory zoning and overgrowths in zircon using 3 MeV mu -PIXE. The Canadian Mineralogist. 31(3). 637–647.30 indexed citations
Teesdale, W.J., et al.. (1991). Practical problems with a proton probe. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 56-57. 694–698.11 indexed citations
Campbell, J. L., A. Perujo, W.J. Teesdale, & J.A. Maxwell. (1987). Analysis of Thick Targets by Proton-Induced X-Ray Emission. Scanning microscopy. 1(4). 14.1 indexed citations
13.
Cabri, Louis J., et al.. (1985). Proton-microprobe analysis of trace elements in sulfides from some massive-sulfide deposits. The Canadian Mineralogist. 23(2). 133–148.72 indexed citations
Maxwell, J.A.. (1963). The laser as a tool in mineral identification. The Canadian Mineralogist. 7(5). 727–737.9 indexed citations
17.
Nickel, Ernest H., et al.. (1960). Holmquistite from Barraute, Quebec. The Canadian Mineralogist. 6(4). 504–512.4 indexed citations
18.
Maxwell, J.A., et al.. (1959). Identification of plagioclase by fusion technique. The Canadian Mineralogist. 6(3). 390–394.2 indexed citations
19.
Maxwell, J.A., et al.. (1958). Possible loss of sodium and potassium during fusion of plagioclase feldspars. The Canadian Mineralogist. 6(2). 288–290.1 indexed citations
20.
Maxwell, J.A., et al.. (1951). DETERMINATION OF TITANIUM IN ROCKS AND MINERALS. Analytical Chemistry.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.