J. W. Nevile
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Education
- Public Administration top 10%
- Co-authors
- Peter KrieslerBinh Tran‐NamVictor ArgyNeil WarrenPeter SaundersB. Bhaskara RaoG. C. HarcourtJoseph Halévi
- Topics
- Economic Theory and Policy (18 papers)Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (12 papers)Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaAzerbaijanBulgaria
In The Last Decade
J. W. Nevile
50 papers receiving 199 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
- Economics and Econometrics 172
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 115
- Sociology and Political Science 62
- Education 42
- Public Administration 38
Countries citing papers authored by J. W. Nevile
This map shows the geographic impact of J. W. Nevile's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. W. Nevile with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. W. Nevile more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. W. Nevile
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. W. Nevile. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. W. Nevile. The network helps show where J. W. Nevile may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. W. Nevile
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. W. Nevile. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. W. Nevile based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. W. Nevile. J. W. Nevile is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | Realising the Potential of Work for the Dole | 3 |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | Evaluating the Structure and Performance of the Job Network | 5 |
| 9 | Work for the Dole: Obligation or Opportunity | 11 |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About J. W. Nevile
J. W. Nevile is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics and Public Administration, having authored 65 papers that have together received 257 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Theory and Policy (18 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (12 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (115 citations), Public Administration (38 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (172 citations). J. W. Nevile has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Azerbaijan and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include Peter Kriesler, Binh Tran‐Nam, Victor Argy, Neil Warren, Peter Saunders, B. Bhaskara Rao, G. C. Harcourt, Joseph Halévi and J.H. Duloy. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic Journal, Southern Economic Journal and Cambridge Journal of Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.