This map shows the geographic impact of J Štěrba's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J Štěrba with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J Štěrba more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J Štěrba. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J Štěrba. The network helps show where J Štěrba may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J Štěrba
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J Štěrba.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J Štěrba based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J Štěrba. J Štěrba is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kohn, Michael A. & J Štěrba. (2013). A COMPARISON OF SOME DIAGNOSTIC FEATURES OF HOPLOPLEURA-ACANTHOPUS AND HOPLOPLEURA-EDENTULA (ANOPLURA, HOPLOPLEURIDAE) UNDER SCANNING ELECTRON-MICROSCOPE. Folia Parasitologica. 34(2). 183.
Štěrba, J, et al.. (1991). Ultrastructure of the male reproductive system of the trematode Brachylaimus aequans.. PubMed. 38(1). 33–7.20 indexed citations
6.
Štěrba, J, et al.. (1990). Ultrastructure of the general body tegument of the trematode Brachylaimus aequans.. Helminthologia. 27(1). 3–9.13 indexed citations
Lojda, Z, et al.. (1989). [The ratio of enterocytes and goblet cells in the mucosa of the small intestine in experimental infection of piglets with the coccidium Isospora suis].. PubMed. 34(1). 33–8.1 indexed citations
11.
Prokopic, J & J Štěrba. (1989). Neoascaris vitulorum (Goeze, 1782): a scanning electron microscopy study.. PubMed. 36(1). 67–9.1 indexed citations
12.
Ditrich, Oleg, J Štěrba, & M Giboda. (1988). [The morphology of the eggs of Paragonimus westermani (Trematoda)].. PubMed. 29(2). 101–5.1 indexed citations
13.
Dusbábek, F, et al.. (1988). Cutaneous and blood leucocyte response of pigeons to larval Argas polonicus feeding.. PubMed. 35(3). 259–68.9 indexed citations
14.
Kohn, Michael A. & J Štěrba. (1986). A COMPARISON OF SOME DIAGNOSTIC FEATURES OF EULAELAPS-STABULARIS (KOCH, 1839) AND EULAELAPS-OUDEMANSI-TURK, 1945 (ACARINA, PARASITIFORMES) BY MEANS OF SCANNING ELECTRON-MICROSCOPE. Folia Parasitologica. 33(2). 173–176.1 indexed citations
15.
Vítovec, J, et al.. (1985). [Adenovirus inclusions in the ileum in coccidiosis in suckling piglets].. PubMed. 30(4). 211–5.1 indexed citations
Prokopic, J, et al.. (1981). [Adiaspiromycosis in small mammals in large capacity pigsties in the Trebon basin].. PubMed. 26(2). 85–93.2 indexed citations
18.
Štěrba, J, et al.. (1979). Tissue reaction in the heart of cattle with a spontaneous and artificial Cysticercus bovis infection.. PubMed. 26(1). 27–33.13 indexed citations
19.
Štěrba, J & Iva Dyková. (1978). Tissue reaction of the skeletal muscles of cattle both to a spontaneous and experimental infection with Cysticercus bovis.. PubMed. 25(4). 347–54.12 indexed citations
20.
Štěrba, J, et al.. (1977). Contribution to the pathology of strobilocercosis (Strobilocercus fasciolaris) in the liver of man and some animals.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 24(1). 41–6.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.