J. Soukup

4.8k total citations
56 papers, 727 citations indexed

About

J. Soukup is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Soukup has authored 56 papers receiving a total of 727 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 15 papers in Radiation and 12 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in J. Soukup's work include Nuclear physics research studies (15 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (12 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (6 papers). J. Soukup is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (15 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (12 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (6 papers). J. Soukup collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Czechia and United States. J. Soukup's co-authors include Roman Kodet, Dean Keiswetter, Thomas H. Bell, Jana Schweigstillová, Alan L. Mayo, Jiří Bruthans, R. Abegg, C. A. Miller, G.C. Neilson and J.M. Cameron and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Blood.

In The Last Decade

J. Soukup

49 papers receiving 703 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J. Soukup Canada 15 246 137 96 90 82 56 727
J. E. Dyson United Kingdom 26 298 1.2× 191 1.4× 145 1.5× 7 0.1× 355 4.3× 156 2.7k
John L. Emmett United States 25 110 0.4× 113 0.8× 188 2.0× 25 0.3× 47 0.6× 56 1.4k
G.C. Salzman United States 20 103 0.4× 337 2.5× 298 3.1× 58 0.6× 14 0.2× 51 1.3k
Vincent Meyer France 18 113 0.5× 297 2.2× 414 4.3× 121 1.3× 55 0.7× 70 1.2k
Mark Müller Germany 22 21 0.1× 121 0.9× 41 0.4× 249 2.8× 14 0.2× 62 1.7k
Kurt A. Zimmerman United States 20 36 0.1× 325 2.4× 48 0.5× 32 0.4× 51 0.6× 50 1.0k
A. J. Smith United States 23 268 1.1× 184 1.3× 674 7.0× 289 3.2× 45 0.5× 47 1.6k
R. Cherubini Italy 24 74 0.3× 482 3.5× 91 0.9× 478 5.3× 10 0.1× 116 1.8k
C. Freiburghaus Sweden 11 470 1.9× 86 0.6× 46 0.5× 55 0.6× 268 3.3× 22 1.2k
Y. Kato Japan 21 42 0.2× 392 2.9× 19 0.2× 7 0.1× 67 0.8× 93 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by J. Soukup

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Soukup's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Soukup with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Soukup more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Soukup

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Soukup. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Soukup. The network helps show where J. Soukup may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Soukup

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Soukup. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Soukup based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Soukup. J. Soukup is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Májovský, Martin, et al.. (2024). Surgical results in patients with CNS lymphoma. Comparison of predictive value of intraoperative MRI and intraoperative histological examination for diagnostic biopsy yield. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4. 103926–103926. 1 indexed citations
3.
Špıčka, Ivan, Maximilian Merz, Jakub Radocha, et al.. (2023). P944: REAL-WORLD PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS AND SURVIVAL OUTCOMES OF LENALIDOMIDE REFRACTORY VS. LENALIDOMIDE EXPOSED RRMM PATIENTS IN THE HONEUR FEDERATED DATA NETWORK. HemaSphere. 7(S3). e258126d–e258126d. 2 indexed citations
4.
Pour, Luděk, Ivan Špıčka, Jakub Radocha, et al.. (2023). P1294: REAL-WORLD OUTCOMES OF 2149 NEWLY DIAGNOSED TRANSPLANT-ELIGIBLE MULTIPLE MYELOMA PATIENTS. HemaSphere. 7(S3). e0151603–e0151603. 1 indexed citations
5.
Průková, Dana, Ladislav Anděra, Zuzana Nahácka, et al.. (2019). Cotargeting of BCL2 with Venetoclax and MCL1 with S63845 Is Synthetically Lethal In Vivo in Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma. Clinical Cancer Research. 25(14). 4455–4465. 63 indexed citations
6.
Klener, Pavel, Eva Froňková, Adéla Berková, et al.. (2016). Mantle cell lymphoma‐variant Richter syndrome: Detailed molecular‐cytogenetic and backtracking analysis reveals slow evolution of a pre‐MCL clone in parallel with CLL over several years. International Journal of Cancer. 139(10). 2252–2260. 9 indexed citations
7.
Klánová, Magdalena, Ladislav Anděra, Jan Bražina, et al.. (2015). Targeting of BCL2 Family Proteins with ABT-199 and Homoharringtonine Reveals BCL2- and MCL1-Dependent Subgroups of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Clinical Cancer Research. 22(5). 1138–1149. 72 indexed citations
8.
9.
Soukup, J., et al.. (2011). Rhodium and Its Compounds in Amperometric Biosensors Based on Redox Enzymes. International Journal of Electrochemical Science. 6(1). 231–239. 6 indexed citations
10.
Jarolím, L., et al.. (2007). Exulcerovaný tumor varlete raritní velikosti. Urologie pro praxi. 8(4). 182–183. 1 indexed citations
11.
Kodet, Roman, Marcela Mrhalová, Lenka Krsková, et al.. (2003). Mantle cell lymphoma: improved diagnostics using a combined approach of immunohistochemistry and identification of t(11;14)(q13;q32) by polymerase chain reaction and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin. 442(6). 538–547. 20 indexed citations
12.
Korkmaz, E., G. V. O’Rielly, D.A. Hutcheon, et al.. (1999). Segmented detector for recoil neutrons in the p(γ, n)π+ reaction. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 431(3). 446–454. 5 indexed citations
13.
Kodet, Roman, Eva Nohýnková, Michal Tichý, J. Soukup, & Govinda S. Visvesvara. (1998). Amebic Encephalitis Caused by Balamuthia mandrillaris in a Czech Child: Description of the First Case from Europe. Pathology - Research and Practice. 194(6). 423–429. 42 indexed citations
14.
McNeely, P., G. Roy, J. Soukup, et al.. (1989). AN ECR ION SOURCE FOR RADIOACTIVE BEAMS AT TRIUMF. Le Journal de Physique Colloques. 50(C1). C1–807. 2 indexed citations
15.
Cameron, J.M., Charles A. Davis, P. Kitching, et al.. (1986). Cross section and analyzing powers for the reaction p3H → γ4He at Ep = 227, 300 and 375 MeV. Nuclear Physics A. 455(4). 687–700. 4 indexed citations
16.
Dawson, W, H. W. Fielding, P. W. Green, et al.. (1985). Elastic scattering of polarized neutrons onO16,Co59, and Pb at 23 MeV. Physical Review C. 32(1). 76–82. 14 indexed citations
17.
Cameron, J.M., Charles A. Davis, H. W. Fielding, et al.. (1984). Analyzing powers in the reaction at 180 and 270 MeV. Physics Letters B. 137(5-6). 315–317. 8 indexed citations
18.
Cameron, J.M., P. Kitching, W.J. McDonald, et al.. (1984). Cross section and analyzing powers for the reaction pd→3He + γ at intermediate energies. Nuclear Physics A. 424(3). 549–562. 16 indexed citations
19.
Abegg, R., J.M. Cameron, D.A. Hutcheon, et al.. (1982). A study of the reaction. Physics Letters B. 118(1-3). 55–58. 9 indexed citations
20.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026