J. Simkin

1.3k total citations
56 papers, 990 citations indexed

About

J. Simkin is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Simkin has authored 56 papers receiving a total of 990 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 16 papers in Mechanical Engineering and 15 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in J. Simkin's work include Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods (24 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (13 papers) and Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (12 papers). J. Simkin is often cited by papers focused on Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods (24 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (13 papers) and Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (12 papers). J. Simkin collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Netherlands. J. Simkin's co-authors include C.W. Trowbridge, C.R.I. Emson, J.B.M. Melissen, Simon Taylor, Alan Armstrong, J.K. Sykulski, M.J. Lancaster, Matteo Repetto, P. Kirby and A.M. Michaelides and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics and Microwave and Optical Technology Letters.

In The Last Decade

J. Simkin

54 papers receiving 875 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J. Simkin United Kingdom 16 687 301 287 231 202 56 990
C.W. Trowbridge United Kingdom 15 560 0.8× 236 0.8× 229 0.8× 228 1.0× 169 0.8× 48 830
A. Kameari Japan 19 776 1.1× 358 1.2× 451 1.6× 225 1.0× 150 0.7× 77 1.2k
E.M. Freeman United Kingdom 17 738 1.1× 289 1.0× 230 0.8× 171 0.7× 145 0.7× 86 1.0k
K.R. Richter Austria 20 909 1.3× 344 1.1× 253 0.9× 409 1.8× 208 1.0× 76 1.4k
R.L. Ferrari United Kingdom 10 875 1.3× 194 0.6× 178 0.6× 441 1.9× 100 0.5× 29 1.2k
Song–Yop Hahn South Korea 22 977 1.4× 347 1.2× 290 1.0× 197 0.9× 126 0.6× 112 1.4k
P.J. Leonard United Kingdom 19 680 1.0× 301 1.0× 294 1.0× 116 0.5× 135 0.7× 69 965
D. Rodger United Kingdom 20 874 1.3× 395 1.3× 385 1.3× 146 0.6× 190 0.9× 89 1.2k
Il-Han Park South Korea 20 680 1.0× 193 0.6× 174 0.6× 173 0.7× 92 0.5× 60 1.0k
Stefan Kurz Germany 15 501 0.7× 120 0.4× 131 0.5× 305 1.3× 171 0.8× 72 772

Countries citing papers authored by J. Simkin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Simkin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Simkin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Simkin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Simkin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Simkin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Simkin. The network helps show where J. Simkin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Simkin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Simkin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Simkin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Simkin. J. Simkin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Michaelides, A.M., et al.. (2010). Permanent magnet (de‐) magnetization and soft iron hysteresis effects. COMPEL The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. 29(4). 1090–1096. 6 indexed citations
2.
Simkin, J., et al.. (2006). The influence of demagnetisation and temperature on the performance of PM machines. COMPEL The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. 25(3). 741–747. 1 indexed citations
3.
Simkin, J., et al.. (2004). Calculation of magnetic vector potential jump on edges in a reduced–total formulations. IEE Proceedings - Science Measurement and Technology. 151(6). 419–422. 3 indexed citations
4.
Simkin, J., et al.. (2004). An Efficient Algorithm for Cutting Multiply Connected Regions. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 40(2). 707–709. 10 indexed citations
5.
Taylor, Simon, et al.. (2001). An adaptive-step time integration method applied to transient magnetic field problems. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 37(5). 3478–3481. 15 indexed citations
6.
Simkin, J., et al.. (1998). Transient electromagnetic analysis coupled to electric circuits and mechanical systems. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 1 indexed citations
7.
Simkin, J., C.W. Trowbridge, Antonella Longo, et al.. (1997). Project MIDAS: Magnet Integrated Design and Analysis System. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 33(2). 1143–1148. 7 indexed citations
8.
Alotto, Piergiorgio, Graham Jared, Antonella Longo, et al.. (1996). Project MIDAS : magnet integrated design and analysis system. CERN Bulletin. 1 indexed citations
9.
Emson, C.R.I., J. Simkin, & C.W. Trowbridge. (1994). A status report on electromagnetic field computation. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 30(4). 1533–1540. 6 indexed citations
10.
Simkin, J. & C.W. Trowbridge. (1992). Optimizing electromagnetic devices combining direct search methods with simulated annealing. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 28(2). 1545–1548. 57 indexed citations
11.
Repetto, Matteo & J. Simkin. (1988). Engineering analysis for design optimisation of differential transformers. 5(2). 51–51. 3 indexed citations
12.
Collins, R., et al.. (1986). The modelling of electrical current NDT methods and its application to weld testing. CentAUR (University of Reading). 28(5). 286–294. 3 indexed citations
13.
Williams, J.E.C., et al.. (1983). Three-dimensional finite-element modelling of a superconducting suspension system. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 19(6). 2615–2618. 1 indexed citations
14.
Simkin, J., et al.. (1983). Enhancements to the PE2D package. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 19(6). 2635–2638. 9 indexed citations
15.
Armstrong, Alan, J. Simkin, & C.W. Trowbridge. (1983). The Galerkin method of weighted residuals applied to the restricted magnetostatic scalar-potential boundary-integral equation in three dimensions. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 19(6). 2329–2332. 5 indexed citations
16.
Simkin, J., et al.. (1982). Methods for eddy current computation in three dimensions. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 18(2). 492–497. 69 indexed citations
17.
Lowther, David A., et al.. (1982). A stack configured vector calculator for electromagnetic field evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 18(2). 627–629. 5 indexed citations
18.
Simkin, J.. (1980). Three-dimensional nonlinear electromagnetic field computation, using scalar potentials. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 127. 7 indexed citations
19.
Simkin, J. & C.W. Trowbridge. (1979). On the use of the total scalar potential on the numerical solution of fields problems in electromagnetics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. 14(3). 423–440. 199 indexed citations
20.
Simkin, J. & C.W. Trowbridge. (1978). WHICH POTENTIAL? A COMPARISON OF THE VARIOUS SCALAR AND VECTOR POTENTIALS FOR THE NUMERICAL SOLUTION OF THE NONLINEAR POISSON PROBLEM. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026