J See

1.2k total citations
27 papers, 850 citations indexed

About

J See is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology. According to data from OpenAlex, J See has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 850 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Social Psychology, 6 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and 5 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology. Recurrent topics in J See's work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (11 papers), Technology Assessment and Management (6 papers) and Occupational Health and Safety Research (5 papers). J See is often cited by papers focused on Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (11 papers), Technology Assessment and Management (6 papers) and Occupational Health and Safety Research (5 papers). J See collaborates with scholars based in United States, Ghana and Russia. J See's co-authors include Joel S. Warm, William N. Dember, Steven R. Howe, Raja Parasuraman, Edward M. Hitchcock, Allison E. Williams, Colin G. Drury, Michael A. Vidulich, David Faulkner and Holly A. H. Handley and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Bulletin, Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society and Ergonomics.

In The Last Decade

J See

22 papers receiving 796 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
J See United States	10	355	330	129	90	69	27	850
Kenji Itoh Japan	23	879 2.5×	114 0.3×	231 1.8×	91 1.0×	78 1.1×	109	1.5k
Shi Cao Canada	22	150 0.4×	564 1.7×	96 0.7×	14 0.2×	35 0.5×	94	1.2k
Valerie J. Gawron United States	15	135 0.4×	417 1.3×	134 1.0×	11 0.1×	77 1.1×	66	933
Daniel Barber United States	13	130 0.4×	490 1.5×	62 0.5×	21 0.2×	99 1.4×	42	793
Patrick Patterson United States	15	167 0.5×	207 0.6×	35 0.3×	9 0.1×	43 0.6×	64	894
Maryam Zahabi United States	16	138 0.4×	408 1.2×	54 0.4×	10 0.1×	52 0.8×	75	932
Francesco Biondi United States	19	206 0.6×	879 2.7×	205 1.6×	17 0.2×	47 0.7×	58	1.3k
Mickaël Causse France	24	523 1.5×	764 2.3×	233 1.8×	7 0.1×	121 1.8×	67	1.4k
Theodora Chaspari United States	17	201 0.6×	284 0.9×	313 2.4×	12 0.1×	93 1.3×	118	1.1k
Mark H. Draper United States	15	170 0.5×	558 1.7×	72 0.6×	13 0.1×	87 1.3×	60	1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by J See

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J See's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J See with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J See more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J See

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J See. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J See. The network helps show where J See may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J See

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J See. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J See based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J See. J See is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

See, J, et al.. (2025). Are humans still necessary? Expanding the discussion. Ergonomics. 1–16.

See, J, et al.. (2025). Proactively Addressing Employee Well-Being to Foster Workplace Safety in a U.S. National Laboratory. ACS Chemical Health & Safety. 32(3). 213–222.

Handley, Holly A. H., et al.. (2024). Human readiness levels and Human Views as tools for user‐centered design. Systems Engineering. 27(6). 1089–1102. 2 indexed citations

See, J, et al.. (2023). People are like plutonium. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 2(2). 2502884330–2502884330. 1 indexed citations

See, J. (2021). Human Readiness Levels Explained. Ergonomics in Design The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications. 29(4). 5–10. 5 indexed citations

See, J, et al.. (2020). Understanding Human Readiness Levels. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 64(1). 1765–1769. 8 indexed citations

See, J. (2020). Maturation of the Human Readiness Level Scale.. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 1 indexed citations

See, J, et al.. (2018). Incorporating Human Readiness Levels at Sandia National Laboratories. Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System). 14(1). 1 indexed citations

See, J, et al.. (2017). Incorporating human readiness levels at Sandia National Laboratories. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 150–153. 4 indexed citations

10.

See, J. (2015). Visual Inspection Reliability for Precision Manufactured Parts. Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 57(8). 1427–1442. 45 indexed citations

11.

See, J, et al.. (2008). A Methodology to Assess Lethality and Collateral Damage for Nonfragmenting Precision-Guided Weapons. 9 indexed citations

12.

See, J, et al.. (2002). Aided and unaided operator performance with synthetic aperture radar imagery. 1. 420–427. 1 indexed citations

13.

Hitchcock, Edward M., et al.. (1999). Effects of Cueing and Knowledge of Results on Workload and Boredom in Sustained Attention. Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 41(3). 365–372. 85 indexed citations

14.

See, J, et al.. (1999). An Investigation of the Effect of Assisted Target Cueing on Operator Target Acquisition Performance with First Generation FLIR Imagery. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 43(1). 76–80. 1 indexed citations

15.

See, J & Michael A. Vidulich. (1998). Computer Modeling of Operator Mental Workload and Situational Awareness in Simulated Air-to-Ground Combat: An Assessment of Predictive Validity. International Journal of Aviation Psychology. 8(4). 351–375. 12 indexed citations

16.

See, J & Michael A. Vidulich. (1997). Assessment of Computer Modeling of Operator Mental Workload during Target Acquisition. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 41(2). 1303–1307. 2 indexed citations

17.

Hitchcock, Edward M., et al.. (1997). Effects of Cueing and Knowledge of Results on Workload and Boredom in Sustained Attention. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 41(2). 1298–1302. 3 indexed citations

18.

See, J, Joel S. Warm, William N. Dember, & Steven R. Howe. (1997). Vigilance and Signal Detection Theory: An Empirical Evaluation of Five Measures of Response Bias. Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 39(1). 14–29. 89 indexed citations

19.

See, J, Steven R. Howe, Joel S. Warm, & William N. Dember. (1995). Meta-analysis of the sensitivity decrement in vigilance.. Psychological Bulletin. 117(2). 230–249. 10 indexed citations

20.

See, J, Steven R. Howe, Joel S. Warm, & William N. Dember. (1995). Meta-analysis of the sensitivity decrement in vigilance.. Psychological Bulletin. 117(2). 230–249. 310 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact