J. Schultz

6.5k total citations
27 papers, 546 citations indexed

About

J. Schultz is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Aerospace Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Schultz has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 546 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 6 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 5 papers in Aerospace Engineering. Recurrent topics in J. Schultz's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (13 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (13 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (8 papers). J. Schultz is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (13 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (13 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (8 papers). J. Schultz collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Switzerland. J. Schultz's co-authors include R. D. Newman, J. K. Hoskins, Robert Spero, John R. Pellam, M. Mandelkern, Charles T. Munger, K. Gollwitzer, D. Christian, G. Zioulas and P.E. Condon and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nuclear Physics B and Physics Letters B.

In The Last Decade

J. Schultz

25 papers receiving 514 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J. Schultz United States 10 351 226 210 99 41 27 546
A. Salat Germany 10 209 0.6× 90 0.4× 175 0.8× 78 0.8× 39 1.0× 51 373
V. Fafone Italy 14 198 0.6× 179 0.8× 410 2.0× 19 0.2× 41 1.0× 51 545
A. V. Timofeev Russia 12 295 0.8× 166 0.7× 151 0.7× 37 0.4× 19 0.5× 80 508
K.-Y. Choi South Korea 4 219 0.6× 205 0.9× 274 1.3× 96 1.0× 15 0.4× 6 492
P. Rapagnani Italy 13 96 0.3× 178 0.8× 381 1.8× 27 0.3× 81 2.0× 49 539
V. Arunasalam United States 16 409 1.2× 163 0.7× 292 1.4× 37 0.4× 22 0.5× 53 568
Arash Ashourvan United States 11 229 0.7× 151 0.7× 160 0.8× 63 0.6× 40 1.0× 23 379
G. Fogaccia Italy 18 805 2.3× 149 0.7× 680 3.2× 49 0.5× 56 1.4× 36 876
Shigetoshi Tanaka Japan 13 434 1.2× 186 0.8× 272 1.3× 32 0.3× 41 1.0× 65 579
B. A. Trubnikov Russia 10 116 0.3× 90 0.4× 98 0.5× 49 0.5× 9 0.2× 45 276

Countries citing papers authored by J. Schultz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Schultz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Schultz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Schultz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Schultz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Schultz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Schultz. The network helps show where J. Schultz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Schultz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Schultz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Schultz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Schultz. J. Schultz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schultz, J., et al.. (2024). Ocean acidification significantly alters the trace element content of the kelp, Saccharina latissima. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 202. 116289–116289. 2 indexed citations
2.
Reiersen, W., G.H. Neilson, S.C. Jardin, et al.. (2002). The design of the Korea Superconducting Tokamak Advanced Research (KSTAR). 2. 725–728.
3.
Christian, D., K. Gollwitzer, M. Mandelkern, et al.. (1998). Observation of Atomic Antihydrogen. Physical Review Letters. 80(14). 3037–3040. 83 indexed citations
4.
Bromberg, L., P. Titus, J. Schultz, Maxim Sidorov, & S. Pourrahimi. (1997). ARIES-RS magnet systems. Fusion Engineering and Design. 38(1-2). 159–188. 14 indexed citations
5.
Anghel, A., C. Marinucci, G. Vécsey, et al.. (1995). The ITER quench experiment on long length at the SULTAN facility. Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne). 2. 881–884. 4 indexed citations
6.
Angelopoulos, Angelos, A. Apostolakis, T. A. Armstrong, et al.. (1989). A search for narrow lines in the gamma spectra from D annihilation at rest. Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements. 8. 54–56. 1 indexed citations
7.
Angelopoulos, Angelos, A. Apostolakis, T. A. Armstrong, et al.. (1988). Neutron emission from antiproton annihilation at rest in uranium. Physics Letters B. 205(4). 590–594. 25 indexed citations
8.
Hoskins, J. K., R. D. Newman, Robert Spero, & J. Schultz. (1985). Experimental tests of the gravitational inverse-square law for mass separations from 2 to 105 cm. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 32(12). 3084–3095. 195 indexed citations
9.
Price, L. R., et al.. (1983). Antiproton-deuteron annihilation intoΛ+anything below 1 GeV/c. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 27(1). 19–25. 7 indexed citations
10.
Hoskins, J. K., R. D. Newman, J. Schultz, & Robert Spero. (1981). Tests of the Gravitational Inverse Square Law Using Torsion Balances. 591.
11.
Reines, F. & J. Schultz. (1980). “The experimental status of baryon conservation”. 1(2). 89–112. 9 indexed citations
12.
Amsler, C., B. Dieterle, J. B. Donahue, et al.. (1980). Search for NarrowN¯NStates near Threshold. Physical Review Letters. 44(13). 853–857. 11 indexed citations
13.
Spero, Robert, J. K. Hoskins, R. D. Newman, John R. Pellam, & J. Schultz. (1980). Test of the Gravitational Inverse-Square Law at Laboratory Distances. Physical Review Letters. 44(25). 1645–1648. 93 indexed citations
14.
Price, LeRoy R., R.R. Burns, P.E. Condon, M. Mandelkern, & J. Schultz. (1975). Analysis of around 1 GeV/c. Nuclear Physics B. 85(2). 326–336. 4 indexed citations
15.
Burns, R.R., P.E. Condon, James P. Donahue, et al.. (1975). Topological cross sections and pion multiplicity analysis forp¯pannihilations near 1 GeV/c. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 12(3). 638–643. 1 indexed citations
16.
Burns, R.R., P.E. Condon, James P. Donahue, M. Mandelkern, & J. Schultz. (1974). Four-pion final state in annihilations at 0.7 to 1.1 GeV/c. Nuclear Physics B. 73(2). 219–230. 10 indexed citations
17.
Burns, R.R., et al.. (1973). ρ0ωInterference in Antiproton Annihilations at 0.65-1.1 GeV/c. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 7(5). 1310–1314. 2 indexed citations
18.
Burns, R.R., P.E. Condon, James P. Donahue, M. Mandelkern, & J. Schultz. (1971). Four-pion final state in pp annihilations at 940 MeV/c. Nuclear Physics B. 27(1). 109–124. 14 indexed citations
19.
Burns, R.R., et al.. (1971). Proton-Antiproton Annihilation intoπ+πandK+Kfrom 700 to 1100 MeV/c. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 4(9). 2658–2666. 8 indexed citations
20.
Tan, T. H., M. L. Perl, F. Martin, et al.. (1968). An investigation of the 1.4 GeV/c2 nucleon isobar in proton-proton interactions. Physics Letters B. 28(3). 195–198. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026