J. Rouger

657 total citations
9 papers, 493 citations indexed

About

J. Rouger is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Rouger has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 493 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 1 paper in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in J. Rouger's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (5 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (5 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (3 papers). J. Rouger is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (5 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (5 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (3 papers). J. Rouger collaborates with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Switzerland. J. Rouger's co-authors include Pascal Barone, Olivier Déguine, Bernard Fraysse, S. Lagleyre, Sophie Denève, Kuzma Strelnikov, Pascal Belin, Pierre Maurage, Marianne Latinus and Patricia E.G. Bestelmeyer and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Neuroscience and Cerebral Cortex.

In The Last Decade

J. Rouger

8 papers receiving 478 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
J. Rouger France	7	442	295	88	84	81	9	493
Maren Stropahl Germany	10	446 1.0×	217 0.7×	50 0.6×	139 1.7×	142 1.8×	12	523
Benoı̂t Jutras Canada	12	502 1.1×	171 0.6×	63 0.7×	89 1.1×	134 1.7×	31	557
Julia Erb Germany	8	332 0.8×	120 0.4×	40 0.5×	51 0.6×	52 0.6×	13	359
Jonathan H. Venezia United States	12	362 0.8×	217 0.7×	59 0.7×	26 0.3×	51 0.6×	26	428
Kathryn Martin United States	8	631 1.4×	126 0.4×	89 1.0×	69 0.8×	298 3.7×	10	683
Efrat A. Schorr United States	5	366 0.8×	147 0.5×	205 2.3×	65 0.8×	73 0.9×	6	438
Lorna F. Halliday United Kingdom	15	503 1.1×	107 0.4×	256 2.9×	85 1.0×	177 2.2×	25	622
Chad S. Rogers United States	11	298 0.7×	127 0.4×	74 0.8×	79 0.9×	27 0.3×	16	334
Tess K. Koerner United States	10	282 0.6×	85 0.3×	72 0.8×	74 0.9×	64 0.8×	24	339
Stephanie Rosemann Germany	12	306 0.7×	117 0.4×	27 0.3×	79 0.9×	141 1.7×	21	357

Countries citing papers authored by J. Rouger

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Rouger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Rouger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Rouger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Rouger

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Rouger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Rouger. The network helps show where J. Rouger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Rouger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Rouger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Rouger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Rouger. J. Rouger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Rouger, J., et al.. (2023). Ambient Light Sensor with 358pW / cm^2 equivalent noise floor for behind screen operation. 1–4.

Strelnikov, Kuzma, J. Rouger, S. Lagleyre, et al.. (2015). Increased audiovisual integration in cochlear‐implanted deaf patients: independent components analysis of longitudinal positron emission tomography data. European Journal of Neuroscience. 41(5). 677–685. 31 indexed citations

Bestelmeyer, Patricia E.G., Pierre Maurage, J. Rouger, Marianne Latinus, & Pascal Belin. (2014). Adaptation to Vocal Expressions Reveals Multistep Perception of Auditory Emotion. Journal of Neuroscience. 34(24). 8098–8105. 68 indexed citations

Belin, Pascal, Chris James, J. Rouger, et al.. (2010). Voice discrimination in cochlear-implanted deaf subjects. Hearing Research. 275(1-2). 120–129. 35 indexed citations

Strelnikov, Kuzma, J. Rouger, Pascal Barone, & Olivier Déguine. (2009). Role of speechreading in audiovisual interactions during the recovery of speech comprehension in deaf adults with cochlear implants. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 50(5). 437–444. 45 indexed citations

Strelnikov, Kuzma, J. Rouger, Jean‐François Démonet, et al.. (2009). Does Brain Activity at Rest Reflect Adaptive Strategies? Evidence from Speech Processing after Cochlear Implantation. Cerebral Cortex. 20(5). 1217–1222. 44 indexed citations

Strelnikov, Kuzma, J. Rouger, S. Lagleyre, et al.. (2008). Improvement in speech-reading ability by auditory training: Evidence from gender differences in normally hearing, deaf and cochlear implanted subjects. Neuropsychologia. 47(4). 972–979. 46 indexed citations

Rouger, J., S. Lagleyre, Bernard Fraysse, et al.. (2007). Evidence that cochlear-implanted deaf patients are better multisensory integrators. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 104(17). 7295–7300. 219 indexed citations

Rouger, J., et al.. (1979). The photooxidation of 1,4-dimethoxy-9,10-diphenyl-anthracene and the chemiluminescent decomposition of its endoperoxide. Journal of Photochemistry. 11(2). 129–134. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact