J. Philip

1.6k total citations
54 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

J. Philip is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Genetics and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Philip has authored 54 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 19 papers in Genetics and 16 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in J. Philip's work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (23 papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (10 papers) and Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (7 papers). J. Philip is often cited by papers focused on Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (23 papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (10 papers) and Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (7 papers). J. Philip collaborates with scholars based in Denmark, United States and Poland. J. Philip's co-authors include Claes Lundsteen, Steen Smidt‐Jensen, J. Bang, Brian Christensen, Niels E. Skakkebæk, Karin Sundberg, Julia Zachary, Elliot S. Vesell, Thue Bryndorf and V. Sele and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and The Lancet.

In The Last Decade

J. Philip

54 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J. Philip Denmark 20 560 387 288 241 114 54 1.1k
A. J. Keay United Kingdom 15 298 0.5× 453 1.2× 231 0.8× 108 0.4× 140 1.2× 31 818
José Carlos Ferreira United States 22 882 1.6× 764 2.0× 816 2.8× 138 0.6× 56 0.5× 39 1.6k
B. Kaplan United States 20 1.2k 2.2× 423 1.1× 210 0.7× 168 0.7× 56 0.5× 55 1.7k
Paul R. Brezina United States 17 580 1.0× 209 0.5× 181 0.6× 90 0.4× 31 0.3× 68 940
Margot Van Allen United States 12 244 0.4× 199 0.5× 125 0.4× 71 0.3× 43 0.4× 15 697
Kui Qian Finland 15 163 0.3× 121 0.3× 500 1.7× 65 0.3× 22 0.2× 24 1.9k
Jennifer M. Sturgess Canada 17 261 0.5× 178 0.5× 176 0.6× 216 0.9× 14 0.1× 29 1.2k
Allison Ryan United States 21 1.9k 3.3× 839 2.2× 633 2.2× 262 1.1× 82 0.7× 27 2.4k
Patrizia Luppi United States 19 110 0.2× 376 1.0× 246 0.9× 344 1.4× 29 0.3× 32 1.3k
N. Maclean United Kingdom 21 170 0.3× 1.0k 2.6× 602 2.1× 364 1.5× 180 1.6× 40 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by J. Philip

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Philip's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Philip with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Philip more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Philip

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Philip. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Philip. The network helps show where J. Philip may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Philip

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Philip. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Philip based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Philip. J. Philip is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Boczkowski, K, et al.. (2009). A CLINICAL AND CYTOGENETICAL STUDY OF XX MALE. Hereditas. 62(3). 285–292. 1 indexed citations
2.
Philip, J., Patrick Mohide, Joe Leigh Simpson, et al.. (2004). Diagnóstico prenatal invasivo al final del primer trimestre: Resultados de un ensayo internacional randomizado (1). 263–265. 1 indexed citations
3.
Philip, J., Richard K. Silver, R. Douglas Wilson, et al.. (2004). Late First-Trimester Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis: Results of an International Randomized Trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 103(6). 1164–1173. 61 indexed citations
4.
Philip, J., et al.. (2004). Spinal anesthesia for cesarean section following inadequate labor epidural analgesia: a retrospective audit. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. 13(4). 239–243. 23 indexed citations
5.
Christensen, Brian, Steen Kølvraa, Thomas Lörch, et al.. (2003). Studies on the Isolation and Identification of Fetal Nucleated Red Blood Cells in the Circulation of Pregnant Women before and after Chorion Villus Sampling. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. 18(5). 376–384. 19 indexed citations
6.
Sundberg, Karin, Claes Lundsteen, & J. Philip. (1999). Comparison of cell cultures, chromosome quality and karyotypes obtained after chorionic villus sampling and early amniocentesis with filter technique. Prenatal Diagnosis. 19(1). 12–16. 8 indexed citations
7.
Sundberg, Karin, J. Bang, Steen Smidt‐Jensen, et al.. (1997). Randomised study of risk of fetal loss related to early amniocentesis versus chorionic villus sampling. The Lancet. 350(9079). 697–703. 120 indexed citations
8.
Sundberg, Karin, Claes Lundsteen, & J. Philip. (1996). EARLY FILTRATION AMNIOCENTESIS FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION OF MOSAICISM DIAGNOSED BY CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING. Prenatal Diagnosis. 16(12). 1121–1127. 1 indexed citations
9.
Sundberg, Karin, J. Bang, V. Brocks, et al.. (1995). Early sonographically guided amniocenteses with filtration technique: follow-up on 249 procedures.. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 14(8). 585–590. 6 indexed citations
10.
Hørding, Ulla, Søren Daugaard, Astrid K. N. Iversen, Johannes E. Bock, & J. Philip. (1992). Detection of human papillomavirus type 16 DNA sequences in archival cervical tissues by the polymerase chain reaction.. PubMed. 116(6). 632–4. 6 indexed citations
11.
Smidt‐Jensen, Steen, et al.. (1992). Randomised comparison of amniocentesis and transabdominal and transcervical chorionic villus sampling. The Lancet. 340(8830). 1237–1244. 120 indexed citations
12.
Sundberg, Karin, Steen Smidt‐Jensen, & J. Philip. (1991). Amniocentesis with increased cell yield, obtained by filtration and reinjection of the amniotic fluid. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1(2). 91–94. 16 indexed citations
13.
Smidt‐Jensen, Steen, et al.. (1991). Sampling success and risk by transabdominal chorionic villus sampling, transcervical chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: a randomized study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1(2). 86–90. 23 indexed citations
14.
Lundsteen, Claes, Tommy Gerdes, Jan Maahr, & J. Philip. (1987). Clinical performance of a system for semiautomated chromosome analysis.. Europe PMC (PubMed Central). 41(3). 493–502. 16 indexed citations
15.
Philip, J. & Claes Lundsteen. (1985). Semiautomated chromosome analysis: A clinical test. Clinical Genetics. 27(2). 140–146. 14 indexed citations
16.
Philip, J. & J. Bang. (1978). Outcome of pregnancy after amniocentesis for chromosome analysis.. BMJ. 2(6146). 1183–1184. 27 indexed citations
17.
Philip, J., J. Bang, & Mette Madsen. (1977). Should the indications for prenatal chromosome analysis be changed?. BMJ. 2(6095). 1117–1119. 5 indexed citations
18.
Philip, J.. (1974). A proof of Isbell's zig-zag theorem. Journal of Algebra. 32(2). 328–331. 5 indexed citations
19.
Nielsen, Henrik, et al.. (1973). Y Chromatin as Indicator of Chimaerism Following Bone Marrow Transplantation in Severe Combined Immunodeficiency. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology. 2(4). 327–332. 3 indexed citations
20.
Teter, J, et al.. (1964). “Mixed” gonadal dysgenesis with gonadoblastoma in situ. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 90(7). 929–935. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A. J. Keay Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by José Carlos Ferreira Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by B. Kaplan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Paul R. Brezina Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Margot Van Allen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kui Qian Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jennifer M. Sturgess Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Allison Ryan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Patrizia Luppi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by N. Maclean
Rankless by CCL
2026