J. Nadel

818 total citations
10 papers, 548 citations indexed

About

J. Nadel is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Nadel has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 548 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 3 papers in Social Psychology and 3 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in J. Nadel's work include Action Observation and Synchronization (3 papers), Reinforcement Learning in Robotics (3 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers). J. Nadel is often cited by papers focused on Action Observation and Synchronization (3 papers), Reinforcement Learning in Robotics (3 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers). J. Nadel collaborates with scholars based in France and Switzerland. J. Nadel's co-authors include Pauline Delaveau, Marco Sperduti, Philippe Fossati, Jacques Martinerie, Nathalie George, Guillaume Dumas, Fanny Lachat, Philippe Gaussier, J.P. Banquet and Sorin Moga and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics - Part A Systems and Humans, Infant Behavior and Development and Brain Structure and Function.

In The Last Decade

J. Nadel

10 papers receiving 524 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
J. Nadel France	9	388	247	104	69	54	10	548
Robin N. Salesse France	18	364 0.9×	334 1.4×	125 1.2×	70 1.0×	73 1.4×	32	573
Lior Noy Israel	13	460 1.2×	476 1.9×	91 0.9×	118 1.7×	184 3.4×	24	703
Oliver Herbort Germany	16	562 1.4×	368 1.5×	51 0.5×	164 2.4×	70 1.3×	57	710
Emilie Delaherche France	5	178 0.5×	254 1.0×	41 0.4×	89 1.3×	101 1.9×	5	414
Dayi Bian United States	12	273 0.7×	94 0.4×	95 0.9×	45 0.7×	74 1.4×	20	506
Kenji Ogawa Japan	15	463 1.2×	218 0.9×	82 0.8×	93 1.3×	69 1.3×	51	661
Andrea Christensen Germany	13	290 0.7×	314 1.3×	33 0.3×	123 1.8×	163 3.0×	23	747
Breanna Erin Studenka United States	12	421 1.1×	176 0.7×	35 0.3×	129 1.9×	42 0.8×	34	580
Dawn Morgan United States	3	295 0.8×	316 1.3×	23 0.2×	104 1.5×	142 2.6×	7	513
Roberta Igliozzi Italy	17	629 1.6×	98 0.4×	153 1.5×	144 2.1×	51 0.9×	26	793

Countries citing papers authored by J. Nadel

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Nadel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Nadel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Nadel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Nadel

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Nadel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Nadel. The network helps show where J. Nadel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Nadel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Nadel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Nadel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Nadel. J. Nadel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Sperduti, Marco, Pauline Delaveau, Philippe Fossati, & J. Nadel. (2011). Different brain structures related to self- and external-agency attribution: a brief review and meta-analysis. Brain Structure and Function. 216(2). 151–157. 215 indexed citations

2.

Noris, Basilio, et al.. (2011). Measuring gaze of children with autism spectrum disorders in naturalistic interactions. PubMed. 2011. 5356–5359. 19 indexed citations

3.

Dumas, Guillaume, Fanny Lachat, Jacques Martinerie, J. Nadel, & Nathalie George. (2011). From social behaviour to brain synchronization: Review and perspectives in hyperscanning. IRBM. 32(1). 48–53. 128 indexed citations

4.

Esseily, Rana, J. Nadel, & Jacqueline Fagard. (2010). Object retrieval through observational learning in 8- to 18-month-old infants. Infant Behavior and Development. 33(4). 695–699. 18 indexed citations

5.

Billard, Aude, Ben Robins, Kerstin Dautenhahn, & J. Nadel. (2006). Building Robota, a Mini-Humanoid Robot for the Rehabilitation of Children with Autism. Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne). 19. 38 indexed citations

6.

Nadel, J., et al.. (2006). Human responses to an expressive robot. University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire). 24 indexed citations

7.

Nadel, J.. (2005). L'imitation : un langage sans mot, son rôle chez l'enfant atteint d'autisme. Neuropsychiatrie de l Enfance et de l Adolescence. 53(7). 378–383. 6 indexed citations

8.

Berthouze, Luc, Frédé́ric Kaplan, Hideki Kozima, et al.. (2004). Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics. Figshare. 12 indexed citations

9.

Andry, Pierre, Philippe Gaussier, Sorin Moga, J.P. Banquet, & J. Nadel. (2001). Learning and communication via imitation: an autonomous robot perspective. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics - Part A Systems and Humans. 31(5). 431–442. 76 indexed citations

10.

Nadel, J.. (1996). Early interpersonal timing and the perception of social contingencies. Infant Behavior and Development. 19. 201–201. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact