J. Mcdermott

713 total citations
9 papers, 132 citations indexed

About

J. Mcdermott is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Mcdermott has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 132 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 2 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in J. Mcdermott's work include Biosensors and Analytical Detection (3 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (3 papers) and RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (2 papers). J. Mcdermott is often cited by papers focused on Biosensors and Analytical Detection (3 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (3 papers) and RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (2 papers). J. Mcdermott collaborates with scholars based in United States. J. Mcdermott's co-authors include B. Scott Ferguson, Jingwen Yu, H. Tom Soh, Michael Eisenstein, Alexander P. Scott, Qin Yang, Qiang Gong, William J. Greenleaf, Jinpeng Wang and Bharanidharan Radha Saseendrakumar and has published in prestigious journals such as Angewandte Chemie International Edition, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

J. Mcdermott

7 papers receiving 132 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
J. Mcdermott United States	5	77	50	23	17	15	9	132
Jeffrey Lau United States	7	62 0.8×	25 0.5×	1 0.0×	14 0.8×	4 0.3×	10	154
Crissa Bennett United States	4	85 1.1×	83 1.7×		11 0.6×	8 0.5×	5	125
Lijuan Sun China	6	32 0.4×	5 0.1×	8 0.3×	14 0.8×	6 0.4×	16	85
S. Kamei Japan	4	36 0.5×	19 0.4×		5 0.3×	4 0.3×	4	89
Christine Wan United States	4	71 0.9×	29 0.6×		3 0.2×	12 0.8×	4	86
Federica Cariti Switzerland	5	99 1.3×	55 1.1×		10 0.6×	14 0.9×	5	205
Paul Raskauskas United States	4	18 0.2×	32 0.6×	68 3.0×	23 1.4×	49 3.3×	5	90
Johan Kuijvenhoven Netherlands	7	44 0.6×	70 1.4×		21 1.2×	3 0.2×	15	134
Edith Lupu Israel	5	28 0.4×	26 0.5×	1 0.0×	12 0.7×	8 0.5×	8	111
V. Lawson United Kingdom	3	43 0.6×	71 1.4×		9 0.5×	3 0.2×	4	107

Countries citing papers authored by J. Mcdermott

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Mcdermott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Mcdermott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Mcdermott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Mcdermott

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Mcdermott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Mcdermott. The network helps show where J. Mcdermott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Mcdermott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Mcdermott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Mcdermott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Mcdermott. J. Mcdermott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Denu, Ryan A., et al.. (2024). Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada-Like Uveitis Secondary to Pembrolizumab in Metastatic Gastric Cancer: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 17(1). 1071–1086.

2.

Mcdermott, J., et al.. (2024). Orbital Complication in the Setting of Cocaine Use: A Case Report and Review of Literature. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 40(5). e178–e181.

3.

Chan, Alison, et al.. (2022). Associations between healthcare utilization and access and diabetic retinopathy complications using All of Us nationwide survey data. PLoS ONE. 17(6). e0269231–e0269231. 14 indexed citations

4.

Saseendrakumar, Bharanidharan Radha, Alison Chan, J. Mcdermott, et al.. (2022). Social Determinants of Health Data Availability for Patients with Eye Conditions. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(2). 100151–100151. 19 indexed citations

5.

Ferguson, B. Scott, Shencheng Ge, Qiang Gong, et al.. (2022). Development of an Aptamer-Based Electrochemical Microfluidic Device for Viral Vaccine Quantitation. Analytical Chemistry. 94(16). 6146–6155. 4 indexed citations

6.

Mcdermott, J., Alison Chan, Bita Shahrvini, et al.. (2021). Novel Association between Opioid Use and Increased Risk of Retinal Vein Occlusion Using the National Institutes of Health All of Us Research Program. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(1). 100099–100099. 4 indexed citations

7.

Wang, Jinpeng, Jingwen Yu, Qin Yang, et al.. (2016). Multiparameter Particle Display (MPPD): A Quantitative Screening Method for the Discovery of Highly Specific Aptamers. Angewandte Chemie. 129(3). 762–765. 9 indexed citations

8.

Wang, Jinpeng, Jingwen Yu, Qin Yang, et al.. (2016). Multiparameter Particle Display (MPPD): A Quantitative Screening Method for the Discovery of Highly Specific Aptamers. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 56(3). 744–747. 73 indexed citations

9.

Mcdermott, J., et al.. (2001). Laboratory Studies on Suspension Feeding in the Hermit Crab Pagurus Longicarpus (Decapoda: Anomura: Paguridae). Journal of Crustacean Biology. 21(3). 582–592. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact